Home U.S. Coin Forum

I wonder if anyone at the Mint ever thinks about using Feuchtwanger's composition?

ms70ms70 Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭✭

Are there any historians there? Could this be a possibility for today's coinage? With copper being so expensive & the dollar coins toning so dark, I wonder if they ever gave this a thought.

Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

Comments

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What's in this alloy?



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • BigE2BigE2 Posts: 1,037
    I'd bet dollars to donuts that if you asked anyone at the mint about that composition, you'd get a blank stare.
  • I doubt there'd be a savings in it for cents image
    Cam-Slam 2-6-04
    3 "DAMMIT BOYS"
    4 "YOU SUCKS"
    Numerous POTD (But NONE officially recognized)
    Seated Halves are my specialty !
    Seated Half set by date/mm COMPLETE !
    Seated Half set by WB# - 289 down / 31 to go !!!!!
    (1) "Smoebody smack him" from CornCobWipe !
    IN MEMORY OF THE CUOF image
  • flaminioflaminio Posts: 5,664 ✭✭✭
    I just like saying "Feuchtwanger". Come on, all together now:

    FEUCHT-WANGER

    Say it loud, say it proud.
  • GemineyeGemineye Posts: 5,374
    Nice research on coinage................................image.................image
    ......Larry........image
  • DD Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I just like saying "Feuchtwanger". Come on, all together now:

    FEUCHT-WANGER

    Say it loud, say it proud. >>



    It's a shame the first syllable sounds more like "Foicht" image.

    -Daniel
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

    -Aristotle

    Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.

    -Horace
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536


    << <i>What's in this alloy? >>


    Basicly Copper, Nickel, and Zinc. It's pretty much the same alloy as the Jefferson nickel but with a little Zinc thrown in. Since nickel is more expensive than copper there's no savings, and since it is silver in color it's no good for the dollar coin. You would be right back to the quarter confusion that the SBA had.
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As a numismatist, Harold couldn't resist sitting around playing with his Feuchtwanger.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>What's in this alloy? >>


    Basicly Copper, Nickel, and Zinc. It's pretty much the same alloy as the Jefferson nickel but with a little Zinc thrown in. Since nickel is more expensive than copper there's no savings, and since it is silver in color it's no good for the dollar coin. You would be right back to the quarter confusion that the SBA had. >>



    I always thought it was some variation of "German silver". Am I correct?


    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • I always thought it was some variation of "German silver". Am I correct?

    Here ya go:

    German-born chemist/inventor Dr. Lewis Feuchtwanger developed an alloy known as "argentum" or “German silver” or “Feuchtwanger's metal,” an amalgam consisting of copper, nickel, zinc and tin (but no silver). He petitioned Congress to adopt his alloy as a replacement for the cumbersome copper large cents, but he was unsuccessful. His one cent tokens are reasonably common, but Feuchtwanger three-cent pieces are decidedly more rare. Hard Times token number: HT-268.

    Hope this helps!

    Cartwheel
  • RegulatedRegulated Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They wouldn't use it because it is far too chemically reactive.

    What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536


    << <i>They wouldn't use it because it is far too chemically reactive. >>


    Actually it was a physical problem. The melting points of zinc and nickel are so far apart that you have a problem with the zinc boiling off while you try to get the nickel to melt. This results in a final alloy that varies in composition from one batch to the next. It was just too difficult at the time to prepare a consistant alloy.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file