Wow! PSA 10 Munson Rookie...

ICE9

...have to check the pop report, seller says it's the only one.

Mike

bri2327

great card, but IMO a weak 10.

zef204

It is the only one, out of 1084 graded. Only 23 9's also.

onefasttalon

WOooW! I near-impossible card to get in a 10! I bet this card clears $8,000! What a find!

larryallen73

If a '75 Brett went for $8k last week I would think a '70 Munson would be worth much more; tougher card, loyal following of Munson and Yankee collectors, etc.... I say $10-12k.

NewJerseyMeatHook

Great item! Folks in my tax bracket simply don't even think about bidding in these types of auctions.

Boopotts

<< <i>great card, but IMO a weak 10. >>



I love this. Just what can you see from a scan that the rest of us can't?

zef204

<< <i>

<< <i>great card, but IMO a weak 10. >>



I love this. Just what can you see from a scan that the rest of us can't? >>

I was wondering the same thing.

downgoesfrazier

I'm the fussiest SOB around here and I was like B-L-A-M! when I looked at that. I got a serious baseball chubbie! That card looks fantastic with the image quality I'd be looking for...now, does anyone have an extra 8 grand I could "borrow"???


dgf

zef204

<< <i>I got a serious baseball chubbie! >>



hee hee

CON40

Katie bar the door!

One thing I love about the '70 set (and Topps design tendencies in general)... they revived the lettering for "Yankees" from the '67 set for the team title on that card... it really works great there and makes me actually like the card more because the '67 set was a killer design.

Stone193

The card is off the chart! Only one 10?

Tell ya what...

I'll take the 8 that was posted the other day and...

take the difference and head out to Vegas!

Cause what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!



PS: I've been using reading glasses for like 15 years now - without them ALL my cards look like 10s!

bri2327

Dont get me wrong....I LOVE the card....would take it in a heartbeat, but it seemed the centering was off a bit for a 10, and from what I see there is a rough edge on it too...could be wrong.....I am not bashing the card, or the grade really, but maybe just expecting too much for the only 10 in existance.

julen23

Nice card indeed!

Personal check or $$$ order only!!!!

SCREW YOU e-bay fees!!!!

Anybody here live in CA? Aren't you guys now being assessed some tax for simply using e-bays' services?

SCREW YOU e-bay, i live in IL beyatch!!!

Julen

wolfbear

<< <i>If a '75 Brett went for $8k last week I would think a '70 Munson would be worth much more; tougher card, loyal following of Munson and Yankee collectors, etc.... I say $10-12k. >>



Don't forget to factor in all the Dave McDonald collectors with deep pockets ...

bri2327

<< <i>The card is off the chart! Only one 10?

Tell ya what...

I'll take the 8 that was posted the other day and...

take the rest of the money and head out to Vegas!

Cause what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!

>>




The 8 posted the other day was mine

jad22

nice card. are there any 10's for his 71 topps.

ROCKDJRW

Too rich for my blood but still a beautiful card!

lawnmowerman

<< <i>Great item! Folks in my tax bracket simply don't even think about bidding in these types of auctions. >>



What you are you talking about?? I saw your yard, you a multi-millionaire

Matt

zef204

<< <i>nice card. are there any 10's for his 71 topps. >>

Nope and only 2 9's of the 71.

Here are all his cards and the pops:

1970 O-PEE-CHEE 189 YANKEES ROOKIES T.MUNSON/D.McDONALD 1 9 2 10 2 2 1 0 0 27
1970 TOPPS 189 YANKEES ROOKIES T.MUNSON/D.McDONALD 8 57 100 188 334 36 275 42 23 3 1 1084
1971 O-PEE-CHEE 5 THURMAN MUNSON ALL-STAR ROOKIE 0 0 1 14 1 2 0 0 20
1971 TOPPS 5 THURMAN MUNSON ALL-STAR ROOKIE 5 20 60 130 169 58 2 0 493
1972 O-PEE-CHEE 441 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 1 2 5 5 1 0 17
1972 O-PEE-CHEE 442 THURMAN MUNSON IA 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 9
1972 TOPPS 441 THURMAN MUNSON 0 9 21 38 100 193 39 1 426
1972 TOPPS 442 THURMAN MUNSON IA 0 5 10 13 48 72 15 1 183
1973 O-PEE-CHEE 142 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 5
1973 TOPPS 142 THURMAN MUNSON 0 9 11 14 58 130 24 0 268
1974 O-PEE-CHEE 340 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
1974 TOPPS 340 THURMAN MUNSON 0 5 26 26 70 230 54 0 429
1975 O-PEE-CHEE 20 THURMAN MUNSON 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 6
1975 TOPPS 20 THURMAN MUNSON 0 4 23 28 94 270 40 2 477
1975 TOPPS MINI 20 THURMAN MUNSON 0 1 4 12 57 102 27 2 240
1976 O-PEE-CHEE 650 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
1976 TOPPS 650 THURMAN MUNSON 1 6 11 12 60 200 68 3 380
1977 O-PEE-CHEE 30 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 0 3 6 5 2 0 17
1977 TOPPS 170 THURMAN MUNSON 2 4 9 9 27 64 13 0 142
1977 TOPPS CLOTH STICKER 32 THURMAN MUNSON CLOTH STICKERS 0 0 1 0 6 45 31 11 99
1978 O-PEE-CHEE 200 THURMAN MUNSON 0 0 0 0 1 11 1 0 14
1978 TOPPS 60 THURMAN MUNSON 1 4 15 25 89 208 132 7 564
1979 TOPPS 310 THURMAN MUNSON 1 1 8 6 19 117 54 3 225

balco757

It sure is sweet and given the 1 of 1, I bet it clears 10K. But, IMHO, I'd rather have 1 of the 2 71 PSA 9's.

bri2327

if anyone has a 71 greatest moments or a 74 deckle Munson they would like to part with pleeeeeeaaase let me know !




here is my 8 that just came back from PSA this week.....

balco757

Wow - that sure is a sweet looking 8. I'd take that and save the 10K. I have a Greatest Moments Thurm. I believe it is a PSA 6 MC - but still nice and obviously a bit rare. PM if you are interested in making a deal.

Steve

larryallen73

Anybody here live in CA? Aren't you guys now being assessed some tax for simply using e-bays' services?

I don't know about any California Ebay tax but there are two things I can tell you having lived here in Cali for 37 of my 38 years and having visited most every state in this fine union: 1) taxes in Cali are high but 2) people from all over the country keep moving here for some reason!? Year round great weather, the hottest women, and the list goes on! High taxes and all it's an extremely great place to live!

ldferg

very nice..i say it ends in 5 figures. mine is more like a 6 if it were graded.

Basilone

was this Chris Reneaud's old card?

rbdjr1

<< <i>Too rich for my blood but still a beautiful card!
>>



Why did this seller use a "grey background" behind the slab, basiclly the same color as the "grey surfaces" of this 1970 topps beauty? Why not use a "contrasting color" behind the slab, that would highlight those gem mint edges and corners on such a monster card?




rbd

CON40

Of all those Munson's listed in the pop report, the toughest card is the '76 OPC... only 2 graded to date (one PSA 6 and one PSA 8)... I own the PSA 8 if anyone is interested in it please PM me... sorry for the spamola, but it seemed an appropriate place to drop it.

RipublicaninMass

FWIW I'd rather have a 71 PSA 10

fiveniner

WOW WOW WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boopotts

<< <i>FWIW I'd rather have a 71 PSA 10 >>



I'll second that. Although I doubt I'll be in the market for either card anytime soon

shagrotn77

<< <i>Dont get me wrong....I LOVE the card....would take it in a heartbeat, but it seemed the centering was off a bit for a 10 >>



Killer card, but I agree the t-b centering is pushing 10 standards.

gemint

Not to bash a beautiful card but the reverse centering bothers me. I wouldn't mind paying the 9 price for it.