Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Please grade this coin for me

Comments

  • Heres an example of the same year from the Ford collection for comparision:
    image
  • AU55
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    au58

    i say 58 because i see a lot of luster left on that coin.
    very eye appealing from the picture.
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,775 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is it genuine, if so , then Il say Au-50 even though I know nothing about colonials

  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My reaction was AU50, due to how extensively wear is present in the fields.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,089 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS I Dunno
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • looks like very old "harsh" cleaning marks in the field.

    The old tooth brush and tooth powder trick from days gone by.
    "Everyday above ground is a good day"

  • seateddimeseateddime Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭
    I would guess AU53-55 but that is a guess
    I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org

    Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.

    Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
  • Heres a hint:

    The marks you see in the fields aren't evidence of wear, and they aren't 'the old tooth brush and tooth powder trick' either. Those are die polishing lines. The color is original and the luster is complete. Its MS. The question is what number?

    By the way, the second coin was called 'unc.' in the stack's sale.

  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    well if AU58 is wrong... it must be MS62?
  • You're getting warmer.
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Very nice coin, clearly uncirculated. I will go with MS-64.

    Tom
    Tom

  • 65 and tell us some history on this coin. please


  • << <i>Heres a hint:

    The marks you see in the fields aren't evidence of wear, and they aren't 'the old tooth brush and tooth powder trick' either. Those are die polishing lines. The color is original and the luster is complete. Its MS. The question is what number?

    By the way, the second coin was called 'unc.' in the stack's sale. >>



    Shows how much i DON'T know
    "Everyday above ground is a good day"

  • I'm going to try 63 for the first coin you posted image
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • JDelageJDelage Posts: 724 ✭✭
    Cook coin. Watizit?
    "The greatest productive force is human selfishness."
    Robert A. Heinlein
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,816 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS without question... 62-63 range and quite attractive.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    When I saw your coin pictures I thought I was on the Dark side forum, one I NEVER will visit.image
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    64 liner 65
  • OldnewbieOldnewbie Posts: 1,425 ✭✭
    I'm not sure if I'm comparing apples to passion fruit but....the Ford coin is an uncirculated contemporary counterfeit. It was listed as "uncirculated" in Ford XIII. I haven't found an example of your coin yet, but it's different from the Ford coin. I can't even try to give it a grade without further study.

    Colonials make my brain hurt.imageimage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file