Nevadaman Col., SAJ Jeffs, %FS .9859, not 100%
leothelyon
Posts: 8,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
At least, this is what it should read for these 2 collections in the PCGS Set Registry for the
Jefferson Nickels FS Basic Set, Circulation Strikes (1938-1964).
The coin that's not in question anymore, the population numbers for a 1960-D MS6XFS is zero. This has
always been the case ever since a few collectors said "nay" to the steps of that infamous coin
over two years ago back in Pittsburgh, even before the auction!
Does anyone know when these changes will be made to the PCGS Set Registry standings?
The standings should show that no-one has ever completed the 1938 to 1964 FS registry set!
Leo
Jefferson Nickels FS Basic Set, Circulation Strikes (1938-1964).
The coin that's not in question anymore, the population numbers for a 1960-D MS6XFS is zero. This has
always been the case ever since a few collectors said "nay" to the steps of that infamous coin
over two years ago back in Pittsburgh, even before the auction!
Does anyone know when these changes will be made to the PCGS Set Registry standings?
The standings should show that no-one has ever completed the 1938 to 1964 FS registry set!
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
0
Comments
<< <i>The PR70DC 1963 cent is still listed in sets (and actually still shows as a pop 1) >>
What a joke this is all turning out to be!
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection