Scans from recent submission - OPC 10's

MuckyMutt

I posted my submission results last week and there was a request for scans - so here they are.

First scan - The Ozzie rookie card with a 9OC compared to JR Richard 10. Ya gotta luv that OPC rough cut.


2nd scan - a nice 79 Reggie 9 and 78 Kranepool 10.


3rd scan - 3 Donruss cards from 83, and 3 different grades. Sandberg 8, Phil Niekro 9OC, and Gwynn 9. I found it difficult to judge the TB centering with this card design. That's about all the difference I see in these 3 cards.

onefasttalon

Sweet lookin' cards Mucky! The Smith looks great! ... A little harsh to give it an OC qualifier though.... gonna list that sucker????

lawnmowerman

Mucky, Nice! I like the Kranepool ,it brings back good memories


Matt

MuckyMutt

<< <i>Sweet lookin' cards Mucky! The Smith looks great! ... A little harsh to give it an OC qualifier though.... gonna list that sucker???? >>



Yep - going out on the Bay on Sunday. I hope people remember to "buy the card, not the holder". I think it looks darn nice for an OC.

Matt- I was going to put that Kranepool next to my Wagner T206 and Mantle rookie... but I can't seem to find them????

divecchia

MuckyMutt...

Congrats on the grades. The Ozzie looks sharp for an OC. I guess it's a little close to the border on the bottom left. Looks great otherwise.

Donato

rbdjr1

Great looking cards! Congrats!


rbd


edit: ...my spin on your "Wizzard of OZ" card: It looks like the PSA grader really liked this card? If the grader wrote it up as a "mis-cut" it would have been sent back to u ungraded! So I guess, ...if I'm right and it is really a "mis-cut", the grader may have just taken into consideration the overall "great looking" eye appeal of the card, and gave it a "mint qualifier" instead of labeling it a "mis-cut and sending it back to u ungraded? (But I'm not sure if it is really a "mis-cut", ...as it may just be the scan, and not my "poor vision" LOL!)...