Home› Sports Talk

Seahawks are going to win.

zef204zef204 Posts: 4,742 ✭✭
in Sports Talk

Big time. I am not a fan, but I see all the hoopla and Steeler talk on ESPN, and no one is giving the Seahawks a chance.

Their offense is more potent, defense has been solid, and they have a veteran QB.

They will jump out to an early 10or14-0 lead and the Steelers will not recover.

I like Bettis and Roethlisberger, but the Seahawks will raise the trophy.
EAMUS CATULI!

My Auctions

Comments

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,643 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cant argue with you....I agree.
  • tkd7tkd7 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭
    I'm on the Seahawk bandwagon as well.

    Not a fan of either team, but I think they will win. Their defense is much better than people think.
  • xbaggypantsxbaggypants Posts: 2,185 ✭✭✭
    I sure hope so!!!
    My E-Mail Address
    Website
  • DaBeefDaBeef Posts: 2,478
    Seabirds are my pick too. Should be a great game no matter the outcome. always hated Hasselbeck though, thought Dilfer was the better choice 4 years ago. I was wrong.
    Am I speaking Chinese?



    image
  • alnavmanalnavman Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭
    Being a Cleveland Browns fan you can probably all guess who I'm rooting for.........and it's not the Stillers......hopefully it's a good game and not a blow-out.....I'd hate to have to be sipping on my beer watching a boring game.....imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Steelers 20 Seahawks 17

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,004 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agreed.

    Seahawks 30
    Steelers 23
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it's hard to annoint the Seahawks as the team to beat. They played in a weak division and the only quality wins they had during the regular season came against a Colts team that was resting their starters and a Giants team that missed three potential game winning FGs. Their opponents winning percentage was something like .350. Then in the playoffs, they beat a Redskins team that had zero offense and a one dimensional Panthers team that had their first and second string RBs sidelined. I'm not saying the Hawks can't win, I'm just saying you can't really look at their stats and say they're the better team because they had so many games against the bottom dwellers of the league (49ers, Titans, Texans, Rams, Cardinals).
    https://ebay.com/sch/gemint/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    Exactly - look at the playoff road of the Seahawks, and the playoff road of Pittsburgh. Quite a difference, eh?
    image
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    You can't fault a team for playing it's schedule. It would be one thing if the Seahawks had limped through the season, but they did win 13 games, were the best team in the NFC, and won 11 out of 12 games.

    Cowher has a history of underperforming in big games (6 AFC championship games, 2-4 record in them and a super bowl loss), and big ben will no doubt be nervous.

    Every 'expert' has the steelers winning big, and I just don't see it.
  • interchangesinterchanges Posts: 864 ✭
    I took the Hawks with four points for just enough money to make me uneasy

    C'mon baby!

    Seattle-14
    Steelers-10

    Cover it by eight so I can enjoy myself.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Man, Seattle played that last 1:13 like crap. And Mike Holmgrem is whining about the touchdown call walking off the field. Seattle was ASLEEP at the wheel that last 1:13.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • interchangesinterchanges Posts: 864 ✭
    halftime was only about forty minutes......sheez!
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> Cowher has a history of underperforming in big games (6 AFC championship games, 2-4 record in them and a super bowl loss), and big ben will no doubt be nervous.

    Every 'expert' has the steelers winning big, and I just don't see it. >>



    What does Cowher's "history" have to do with NOW? Mike Holmgrem is the bafoon as of early third quater. Even though he has a positive "history" in the Super Bowl. The Steelers may roll now ..... as Ben looks anything BUT nervous

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • papabearpapabear Posts: 851 ✭✭
    GO STILLERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    now THAT was a pis$ poor pass by Ben ....... great game now!

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Looks like the 'experts' were right.

    S T E E L E R 'S !!!!!


    image


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    Bill Cowher has now re-written his history.

    Have a great night Steeler fans imageimageimage

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • zef204zef204 Posts: 4,742 ✭✭
    Great game. Congrats Steeler fans!
    EAMUS CATULI!

    My Auctions
  • sandmanfromlvsandmanfromlv Posts: 432 ✭
    the STEALERS got away with one...
Sign In or Register to comment.