Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Does this centering rate a 10 to you?

I actually have one of these cards, but held off sending it in because the centering wasn't perfect, but now I see this:

image

Does this look like a 10 to you?

As a side note, I would have thought PSA had a better holder solution than these cards. Not only does it look like crap, I'm concerned about corner damage over time.

Comments

  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    NO!!!!

    Stingray
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,437 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pass.

    Mike
  • Now I'm REALLY confused about centering......image
    image
    For the love of the game
    And the cards that go with it
  • divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I actually have one of these cards, but held off sending it in because the centering wasn't perfect, but now I see this:

    image

    Does this look like a 10 to you?

    As a side note, I would have thought PSA had a better holder solution than these cards. Not only does it look like crap, I'm concerned about corner damage over time. >>



    No,,,it doesn't.

    And in that holder it won't be a 10 for long. Ship it somewhere and you'll see.

    Donato
    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I have a few of those too. I think they came out of cracker jack?

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭
    No, believe it or not, the 1991 Topps Cracker Jack is actually a little LARGER than the Topps Micro. The Cracker Jacker version is exactly 1/4 the size, the Micro is roughly 1/5. The CJ version has a completely different back and is numbered #22 out of 36. The backs of the Micros are an exact copy of the regular Topps issue including the same number (#530), which may appear novel at first, but quickly becomes VERY annoying as there's no way to read all information without a magnifying glass. Little wonder this concept didn't go any where.

    Anyway, I've always been a fan of the '91 Topps Clemens #530 card and I've been trying to track down all the variations of it. Thus far, I've only been able find these, but not sure if there are any others.

    '91 Topps (regular issue)
    '91 Topps Tiffany
    '91 Topps Desert Shield
    '91 Topps Cracker Jack
    '91 Topps Cracker Jack uncut dealer promo (w/B.Santiago, P.Molitor, F.Viola)
    '91 Topps Micro
    '91 Topps Pre-Production sample (same front, unnumbered back)
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>I have a few of those too. I think they came out of cracker jack?

    Steve >>



    I know they come in factory sets, which you can usually pick up for $3-$5
  • envoy98envoy98 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭
    No, that looks awful. Not to mention it looks a bit diamond cut besides. Hmm...
  • AllenAllen Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭
    Hard to believe someone got those graded. I can understand PSA not making holder for them.
  • ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,245 ✭✭
    At least it has "4 Sharp Corners", if you know what I mean!

    Looks like that could've been part of a large submission and got a little 'turn your head and grade' option on it.
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>At least it has "4 Sharp Corners", if you know what I mean!

    Looks like that could've been part of a large submission and got a little 'turn your head and grade' option on it. >>



    If you were going to give a dealer preferential treatment it probably wouldn't be on a 1991 Topps micro card.
Sign In or Register to comment.