Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Doesn't paper loss drop a card to PSA 1?

Am I mistaken?

Regards,


Alan

image

Comments

  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Probably, I guess. Does it matter much? Eye appeal seems to rule more than technical grades in Grades 1-4. I see tons of examples between all the companies that either look great or horrible for the grade. At least it's clear what you're getting.

    A PSA Good 2 card's corners show accelerated rounding and surface wear is starting to become obvious. A good card may have scratching, scuffing, light staining, or chipping of enamel on obverse.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • tkd7tkd7 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭
    I've seen cards with paper loss on the back that are PSA 2, but none like that.
  • tennesseebankertennesseebanker Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭
    I have a 74 topps Pete Rose with just a very small, miniscule loss on the back
    image

  • tennesseebankertennesseebanker Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭
    I forgot to mention it is a PSa 7
    image

  • bxbbxb Posts: 805 ✭✭
    I have found the grading to be slightly more lenient on the older pre-war cards.
    Capecards
  • 2 cards from the 60's with paperloss on the front about the size of the point of a pen, both 8s. I probably should add that they are very sharp in every other respect except for the paper loss. The 62 Mantle/Mays has the paperloss on Mick's left forearm and the 66 Palmer on the right border 1/2" from the top.
    image
    image
    Collecting Vintage Baseball.
    My ebay listings
  • stevekstevek Posts: 28,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    <<< I have found the grading to be slightly more lenient on the older pre-war cards. >>>


    I completely agree with that. Technically, the age of the card isn't supposed to matter with grading, but it reality for pre-WW2 cards it does matter - these cards aren't graded as strictly in my opinion.
Sign In or Register to comment.