Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

this was pulled at the flea market around the corner from me

just saw the guy talking about it on the local news. he's already the 4th owner, according to him. wonder what the flea market puller got for it? 5k?

auction link

Comments

  • I always thought the card would have been better if it was signed by Mickey Mantle rather than Mickey Mant image
    Collecting UT Alumni....
  • no kidding, what an ugly cut....
  • tkd7tkd7 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭
    Those are some of the worst scans/pictures I've ever seen for an auction of a card of that value.
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    monkeys at helm i tell you....

    image

    Julen
    image
    image
    RIP GURU
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭
    Knuckles work blows this stuff away.....

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

  • KnucklesKnuckles Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭
    Thanks image

    I would love to do a Ruth or a Mantle let alone both on one card. Eventually it will happen I'm sure. image
    image
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,437 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree - very bad crop job!

    Moreover, I think the price is outrageous! You can get a really nice cut Ruth for in the few grand range and the Mantle for about 100?

    And Knuckles can make a card that will knock your sox off!!!!

    Just because it's from a card company? Artificial value IMO.

    mike

    Mike
  • envoy98envoy98 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭
    Didn't the Wagner, Mantle, Ruth, Gehrig quad 1/1 from UD HOF only sell for $28k? I know that was pulled at the national this year.

    On a side note...how old is that Williams auto? His auto, more specifically the "W" changed a lot after his strokes, that one has to be 30+ years old. It looks weird.
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>I agree - very bad crop job!

    Moreover, I think the price is outrageous! You can get a really nice cut Ruth for in the few grand range and the Mantle for about 100?

    And Knuckles can make a card that will knock your sox off!!!!

    Just because it's from a card company? Artificial value IMO.

    mike >>




    Agreed. These prices just baffle me. Go buy a signed baseball from each guy on the card and donate the rest to starving kids in Africa.
  • what a joke and a ripoff.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    39k that's all?

    sheesh


    <eye roll>


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Whats the difference between someone paying extra for this card, or someone paying a lot for any other rare card? Its the set and the card that are very collectible not the autographs themselves.
    www.sportsnutcards.com
    Specializing in Certified Autograph Cards, Rookies, Rare Inserts and other quality modern cards! Over 8000 Cards in stock now! Come visit our physical store located at 1210 Main St. Belmar ,NJ
  • A761506A761506 Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭
    Who in their right mind would spend even close to that amount of money on a card that everyone knows will never hold its value. Years down the road, it won't matter that it is a Upper Deck issued 1/1 card, the value will be determined solely by the value of the cut signatures. The 4 of those combined are worth somewhere in the vicinity of $2-3K probably. Why would someone pay such a premium just because Upper Deck glued them into a card?

    I do not understand modern baseball cards. Why do the companies even bother to produce regular sets, seems no one even collects them and the cards are worthless. People open the packs looking strictly for the inserts or signatures of unproven rookies. The whole thing seems pretty darn stupid. What is so special about getting the autograph of some 19 year old kid who has never been past A-ball, but got a $5M signing bonus? If he makes it big, he'll have signed his autograph to thousands of cards and items over the course of his career. Getting a regular card of superstars like Pujols or A-Rod is nearly meaningless. Plus, the quality is so good and consistent, there's little risk in it. Pulling miscut or horribly off-center cards on a consistent basis is a thing of the past for the most part. No gum stains to worry about, no wax stains either. Kinda takes away from the whole thrill of opening a pack of baseball cards. Kids today aren't even interested in reading the cards, they just want the inserts. What a shame.


  • Those are 4 of the crappiest cuts autos I've ever seen, or at least the crappiest job of mounting them.


    God I'm so glad that I collect vintage.
  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭
    <<I always thought the card would have been better if it was signed by Mickey Mantle rather than Mickey Mant >>

    That's why I think Berk Ross would have been a better choice than the Mick for this card. Or maybe Ed Ott.

    In any case, I am not a fan of the "2-sided" autograph / game-used cards. Can you imagine submitting this thing to PSA? Would you have to specify on the submission which side is the front?


  • << <i>I do not understand modern baseball cards. Why do the companies even bother to produce regular sets, seems no one even collects them and the cards are worthless. People open the packs looking strictly for the inserts or signatures of unproven rookies. >>



    It's just legalized gambling...thanks Upper Deck...no difference than buying a scratch lotto card....except that a nine year can openly buy the cards not the lotto ticket....

    Stickin' with the oldies...might "gamble" on a new pack or two hoping to hit a card that will let me afford some more oldy goldies...
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,437 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Whats the difference between someone paying extra for this card, or someone paying a lot for any other rare card? Its the set and the card that are very collectible not the autographs themselves. >>


    Ted

    Very good point.

    My problem? The "true" rarities have withstood the test of time. If someone plunks down megabucks on this card, it just may not. I'm not talking about appreciation and ROI here - I'm talking about getting "present" value that may be artificially created.

    It's the difference between purchasing the Hope Diamond or a lump of coal that I "hope" will become another Hope Diamond. Sorry for the small pun.

    mike
    Mike
  • tkd7tkd7 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭


    << <i>I do not understand modern baseball cards. Why do the companies even bother to produce regular sets, seems no one even collects them and the cards are worthless. People open the packs looking strictly for the inserts or signatures of unproven rookies. The whole thing seems pretty darn stupid. What is so special about getting the autograph of some 19 year old kid who has never been past A-ball, but got a $5M signing bonus? If he makes it big, he'll have signed his autograph to thousands of cards and items over the course of his career. Getting a regular card of superstars like Pujols or A-Rod is nearly meaningless.

    << <i>

    I've picked out a few favorite players and I do buy their regular cards. The plus sides are that dealers practically give them away, the photos are great, and the cards are practically pristine. I collect some things just to collect, not turn a profit. Its just my nature.



  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭
    jlbs
    is that in the Rochester, NY area?
  • Buffalo. It came from the Walden Ave. "Super Flea" From my limited experience, I think there's about about a half dozen or so guys that sell cards there, a couple with some newer stuff like this...


  • << <i>I always thought the card would have been better if it was signed by Mickey Mantle rather than Mickey Mant image >>



    Ain't nothing wrong with Mickey Mant. Mickey Mant. was over three quarters the player Mickey Mantle was. All the "le" stands for is Limited Edition. That's all image
    Nothing smoother than listening to Bob James and sipping on a glass of vintage Courvoisier! It's PIMPnificent!
    image
  • ttt
Sign In or Register to comment.