Home› PCGS Set Registry Forum

Know what stinks about collecting low pop (high grade) coins?

LincolnsRuleLincolnsRule Posts: 1,738 ✭
in PCGS Set Registry Forum
They're always low end for the grade. For a very fundamental reason. If high end for the grade ones existed, it wouldn't be such a hard coin to find in that grade, and the pop wouldn't be low!

Comments

  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    They're always low end for the grade.

    absolutely not true for all pre 1915 coins in ms and proof

    some yes

    most maybe

    but not all
  • LincolnsRuleLincolnsRule Posts: 1,738 ✭
    I meant mostly 1916-date coins. Of course not litterally every single one, but nearly all.
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    oh yes now i totally agree 1916-date

    OH YES

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I simply do not agree with the 1916 and later coins commentary.

    Sure, I would agree with a comment that the majority of them are low end for the grade but not "nearly all" and certainly not "all."

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293 ✭
    NO--I think many of TDN's pre- 1916 coins and Stewart Blays pop-top post- 1916 coins are actually undergraded for liability reasons.image
    morgannut2
Sign In or Register to comment.