Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Gussing Game #2; 1963 PSA-10 Mantle

Take you best shot what the final price will be...winner gets the usual....nothing.

1963 PSA-10 Mantle for auction

Good luck.

My guess: $11,570

Comments

  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    I love the description line used in the auction about what Kaline said! I will say $11,850.


    Stingray
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    $9985.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • DaBigHurtDaBigHurt Posts: 1,066 ✭✭
    Before anyone comes and says the Mantle looks trimmed, we should keep in mind you can't tell the size of a card from a scan. image
    image

    GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,282 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow!
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭
    I don't think it will hit the minimum bid due to Sothebys and SCP making it so ridiculous and impossible to bid. Trying to place bids last week for 20 minutes just pissed me off. Then they want my bank information? I will do business with the other guys. I don't care what crap you put in the auction, I am not going to give my personal information to a baseball card dealer/auction house.
    Just my opinion
    1954
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • sagardsagard Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭
    I think that card will sell well. The solid green base and unbelievable clarity in the picture is simply too alluring for people to get shut down by a cumbersome auctioneer.

    $11,000 is my guess.
  • I have a feeling 12,842 .......just a feeling........
    "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum"
    (If you want peace, prepare for War).........Semper Fi
  • we talking final price with or without the 20% buyers premium? i'll say $12,555 with the premium. matrix
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 31,022 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't think it will hit the minimum bid due to Sothebys and SCP making it so ridiculous and impossible to bid. Trying to place bids last week for 20 minutes just pissed me off. Then they want my bank information? I will do business with the other guys. I don't care what crap you put in the auction, I am not going to give my personal information to a baseball card dealer/auction house.
    Just my opinion
    1954 >>



    I agree with you 100%
  • I didnt know Topps made minis in 63.
  • DaBigHurtDaBigHurt Posts: 1,066 ✭✭
    heh.
    image

    GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
  • love ya big hurt
  • SOMSOM Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭
    Love the card. But I love your logo better, stevek!

    Penn State 35 FSU 10

    Nick
  • I am just amazed that the seller, Sothebys, is a Ebay power seller with a 97.4%. Kind of sad for a major New York auction house.
  • tkd7tkd7 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭
    saw the card at the sotheby's reception tonight. i have to say, it wasn't that impressive for a 10.
  • jayhawkejayhawke Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭
    $10,385 plus buyers premium.
  • dang, i was off by $83.00. oh well, matrix
  • spacktrackspacktrack Posts: 1,084 ✭✭
    Matrix, the auction is tomorrow. You still have time to be right. image
  • marinermariner Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I didnt know Topps made minis in 63. >>



    This is most likely a presentation set card. I own a '63 presentation set and I can vouch for the fact that all the cards are different sizes with many of them a little smaller than the cards out of packs. If they are too small, PSA will not grade and give you a 'does not meet minimum size requirements' but if the card is slightly smaller but within tolerance then they will grade it. I have quite a few like that in my set.
    Don

    Collect primarily 1959-1963 Topps Baseball
    set registry id Don Johnson Collection
    ebay id truecollector14
  • Well it's over and the winner with premium paid

    $16,800


    A bit above the guesses.
Sign In or Register to comment.