<< <i>Interesting. However, there's no grading opinion so I can't associate it with value. >>
How does one value counterfeits?
But I agree -- it should have a grade on it. Unless... Perhaps it was sent in on ANACS' autheticate only option. For real coins, these have no grade and are labeled only "** GENUINE **". Obviously, they can't label this one "genuine".
Interest and demand. The 1902-O Micro O traded for 3200 once in a PCGS VF25 holder. Now considered counterfeit, they still trade, but not quite that high.
There are lots of very interesting contemporary counterfeits that circulated particularly early in US history. Some are pretty valuable-- Even the famous 6 figure value "Strawberry Cent" is a possible example. With that exception does Anacs certify all contempory counterfeits (not Chinese fakes etc.) as "undetermined origin" now????
I don't think you need to worry about a grading opinion because most that I've seen were in the G-VG range. I've read there were higher grade coins, but I'm sure they're in strong hands right now. All I could manage to collect was one 1896-O micro O that grade VG by PCI. I picked it up off of eBay several years back for $9.99 + S&H. At the time, I couldn't believe I was the only one that saw that coin.
<< <i>PCGS was the first. They were the ones with the initial press release. >>
No PCGS was the last. NGC was the first to stop slabbing them. They decided over five years ago that they were not genuine and stopped slabbing them. That was why when PCGS came out with their press release NGC only had 8 coins outstanding in their holders.
Comments
<< <i>I dont follow. Why does it say "undertimined origin" on it? >>
1896, 1900, and 1902 Micro-Os have been determined to be contemporary counterfeits.
Free Trial
<< <i>Interesting. However, there's no grading opinion so I can't associate it with value. >>
Just imagine the trouble if it was a problem piece and NOT Net graded.
<< <i>Interesting. However, there's no grading opinion so I can't associate it with value. >>
How does one value counterfeits?
But I agree -- it should have a grade on it. Unless... Perhaps it was sent in on ANACS' autheticate only option. For real coins, these have no grade and are labeled only "** GENUINE **". Obviously, they can't label this one "genuine".
Interest and demand. The 1902-O Micro O traded for 3200 once in a PCGS VF25 holder. Now considered counterfeit, they still
trade, but not quite that high.
Free Trial
******
The coin was slabbed early last week.
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>The link no longer works. I'd like to see the slab label
The host changed the filename for some reason. Here's the fixed link:
http://www.members.aol.com/westdairy2/1902.jpg
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>Because they're counterfeits. All the major grading services stopped grading them earlier this year, PCGS being the last. >>
PCGS was the first. They were the ones with the initial press release.
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>Thanks! >>
Surfing a little more, I notice that this guy has a complete set:
Even if they are fakey, it's still a pretty cool set!
Semper ubi sub ubi
<< <i>PCGS was the first. They were the ones with the initial press release. >>
No PCGS was the last. NGC was the first to stop slabbing them. They decided over five years ago that they were not genuine and stopped slabbing them. That was why when PCGS came out with their press release NGC only had 8 coins outstanding in their holders.