VAM-26, mintmark wrong and no eye spikes. Nope. VAM-27, no broken denticle or broken D of Dollar. VAM-56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 & 72 - not an obverse match.
Possibly B1h reverse, same as VAM-72.
I cannot vam this coin using the attribution guide. Larry Briggs had one like this at the CrabState Coin Show in May...Rob Joyce saw it as well. To my knowledge it's not been submitted to Leroy. Might be the same as yours.
I would send this to Leroy Van Allen as possibly a new discovery. Congradulations!
Darn it Wayne, I knew I should have sniped higher!
Comments
******
******
Free Trial
******
******
VAM-27, no broken denticle or broken D of Dollar.
VAM-56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 & 72 - not an obverse match.
Possibly B1h reverse, same as VAM-72.
I cannot vam this coin using the attribution guide. Larry Briggs had one like this at the CrabState Coin Show in May...Rob Joyce saw it as
well. To my knowledge it's not been submitted to Leroy. Might be the same as yours.
I would send this to Leroy Van Allen as possibly a new discovery. Congradulations!
Darn it Wayne, I knew I should have sniped higher!
Free Trial
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I knew we'd get an answer once we got an expert involved!
Free Trial
******