Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

are these 4 oc? help!

hi,
I was wondering if anyone could determine if these cards would get the OC qualifier or not.
thanks
John
image
image
Collecting
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS

Comments

  • AhmanfanAhmanfan Posts: 4,395 ✭✭✭✭
    well, rats. the frank is a very nice card. thanks for your post!
    John
    Collecting
    HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
  • Frank is close. I'd still submit. IMO.
  • eyeboneeyebone Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭
    I am no expert, but the Robinson might be OK; the others look OC to me. Good luck.

    Eyebone

    "I'm not saying I'm the best manager in the world, but I'm in the top one." Brian Clough
  • The Robinson..may have a chance at no OC..as it is only off TB...but if it does not get the qualifier, they will knock it down atleast a full grade...
    Nice raw card...it does have the gray print mark in the left border and the top right corner "might" be touched....but is that just the scan??

    All depends on what you'd be happy getting for a grade.....

    As for the other 3....ALL should get the OC qualifiers...as they are off both TB and LR....
  • rbdjr1rbdjr1 Posts: 4,474 ✭✭


    << <i>well, rats. the frank is a very nice card. thanks for your post!
    John >>



    John, what would you call that "top/bottom" of the Robinson? At first glance John, it looked OC top to bottom. Did I make a "rash call" and it is 70/30 or better? (i.e., John, remember your question was not about weither the cards were nice (Frank in paticular!), but "would PSA make them a PSA OC qualifier"?)

    Quote from Collector's Universe/PSA Submissions:

    "PSA Mint 9 is a superb condition card that exhibits only one of the following minor flaws: a very slight wax stain on reverse, a minor printing imperfection or slightly off-white borders. Centering must be approximately 60/40 to 65/35 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the reverse.

    PSA NM-MT 8 is a super high-end card that appears Mint 9 at first glance, but upon closer inspection, the card can exhibit the following: a very slight wax stain on reverse, slightest fraying at one or two corners, a minor printing imperfection, and/or slightly off-white borders. Centering must be approximately 65/35 to 70/30 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the reverse."

    rbd
  • The Frank is the very kind of "OC stuff" that I like to STEAL super-cheap
    when it is in a PSA (OC) holder. Such cards have virtually "full eye-appeal,"
    but they still get discounted to a ridiculously low price.

    As time passes - maybe not too much time - the rarity of some of these
    cards is going to make the top-to-bottom "OC problem" irrelevant.
    (IMO, there are great bargains to be had in vintage football cards that
    have this "defect.")

    Top-to-bottom OC is just not that offensive to look at in most instances;
    especially with the portrait shots vs. the horizontal shots.

    I would not buy the other cards in the scans because the OC is
    too distracting. (Side-to-side (L/R) OC is not offensive to me in a card
    that has a full-bleed on one edge. 1963 TOPPS Colt 45s Team
    card is an easy example of this, and there are countless others.)

    I would CERTAINLY submit the Frank. It is a very pretty card and
    will look nice notwithstanding the OC qualifier.

    Cher

  • AhmanfanAhmanfan Posts: 4,395 ✭✭✭✭
    top border is 6 MM

    bottom border is 2.5 MM

    not sure what that translates to % wise? Anyone?

    Either way, I think the Frank is a $25 well spent. I'll pay that for NM '61 topps HOFers like Frank all day long.

    John
    Collecting
    HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
  • yawie99yawie99 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    I'd say all would get an OC as PSA 8's. I'm too lazy to count pixels right now, but your measurements on the Robinson put it very close to, but just outside 70-30. Probably a 7 NQ. On just a first glance, the other cards look too OC even for straight 7's.
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • If your 6mm and 2.5mm are dead on,
    it is no worse than (about) 70.58/29.42 .....

    I got that with 6 / 8.5 and 2.5 / 8.5 .....
    (There is probably a better "formula" to
    use, but I am only semi math-literate.)

    I would say it has a chance to slide by, if it
    otherwise looks as nice as the scan seems
    to indicate. Sadly, they may NOW be "on the
    lookout" for it.

    Cher

  • envoy98envoy98 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭
    FYI, this is what I'm coming up with.

    Clubbers: TB:71/29 LR:64/36

    Chance: TB:70/30 LR:56/44

    Robinson: TB:71/29 (70.3/28.7) LR:52/48

    Hall: TB:61/39 LR:71/29



    Hope that helps.

    -Josh
  • packCollectorpackCollector Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭
    all oc , robinson may go straight 7 , the others will get qualifiers
Sign In or Register to comment.