Yes, I think a batch was coined, then later (notice the rusted dies) they were restruck but the die allignment was different. I guess the anvil die was the Eagle die and they dropped the struck coin in so the Eagle popped into place. This was graded PR-64 by PCGS labeled J-164 original. I tend to use die state as a determinent as to Original or Restrike. I'm not so sure about PCGS.
<< <i>Yes, I think a batch was coined, then later (notice the rusted dies) they were restruck but the die allignment was different. I guess the anvil die was the Eagle die and they dropped the struck coin in so the Eagle popped into place. >>
If this is true then the rotation direction and the amount of rotation should be the same on each piece. If they are inconsistant then it could possibly indicate that the egle was the anvil and the hammer die was loose and shifted between strikes.
I believe they all have the same rotation, although I've only seen two like this. Rick Kay, could confirm this. The die states should all be the same as well.
Here is an earlier die state piece without the double striking. Notice it stll has the die rust (obverse rim 3:00 to 5:00) but the Eagle's wing is not polished into the field.
<< <i>I believe they all have the same rotation, although I've only seen two like this. Rick Kay, could confirm this. The die states should all be the same as well.
Here is an earlier die state piece without the double striking. Notice it stll has the die rust (obverse rim 3:00 to 5:00) but the Eagle's wing is not polished into the field. >>
Comments
Is it for sale????
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
<< <i>Yes, I think a batch was coined, then later (notice the rusted dies) they were restruck but the die allignment was different. I guess the anvil die was the Eagle die and they dropped the struck coin in so the Eagle popped into place. >>
If this is true then the rotation direction and the amount of rotation should be the same on each piece. If they are inconsistant then it could possibly indicate that the egle was the anvil and the hammer die was loose and shifted between strikes.
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
Fly-In Club
My PCGS Registry Sets
Here is an earlier die state piece without the double striking. Notice it stll has the die rust (obverse rim 3:00 to 5:00) but the Eagle's wing is not polished into the field.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/publishedset/209923
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/album/209923
<< <i>I believe they all have the same rotation, although I've only seen two like this. Rick Kay, could confirm this. The die states should all be the same as well.
Here is an earlier die state piece without the double striking. Notice it stll has the die rust (obverse rim 3:00 to 5:00) but the Eagle's wing is not polished into the field.
>>
I must say that I really like this coin.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear