Home U.S. Coin Forum

Proof Lincoln images with different bulbs

lsicalsica Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭
Wondering which image the group likes better. Same coin, no modifying with software, just different bulbs.
image

image
Philately will get you nowhere....

Comments

  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    The first one looks more accurate, but you do have the coin in hand...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • ddbirdddbird Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭
    I like the 1st...makes the fields appear deeper.
  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭
    The first one has much better color
    image
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #2.....Better bust detail.
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,295 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can see the beard in #2.image
    They both look great.
    Larry

  • I would go with the first one.
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,160 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #1 by far. Excellent photo.
  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    The first has better color, but the angle of the lights need adjusting - the dark line on Lincoln's forehead (and to a lesser extent, at the top of his hair) is distracting, to me.
  • I'd say #1 is more accurate for the color but #2 seems to show better detail.

    It also looks like you moved the light source when you took the second picture.


  • I’m actually torn. Picture #1 seems kind of washed out because of the light. I think it is much easier to see the detail in Lincoln, but I don’t like the streak of light through the date and mint mark in Picture #2.
    imageimage
  • lsicalsica Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, the lighting position is somewhat different between the two, which I'm sure accounts for the detail differences. I was taking some quick pics just to basically compare color.

    Camera: Kodak LS-753 5MP Easy Share camera
    Settings: Macro ("Close Up"), White Balance setting "Incandescent"

    Bulbs: 4 incandescent blubs (not spots or floods) in 4 Target desklamps with bendable snake necks for positioning
    Picture 1: GE Reveals (of course)
    Picture 2: Sylvania Daylights

    Didn't realize myself just how different they were until I posted them here and saw the results myself. I agree with the majority, the Reveals are better. Guess I shouldn't've been surprised. Didn't realize how much of a "greenish" tint the Sylvanias put on a pic until I saw them compared to a Reveal pic
    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmmm......Must be either my monitor, or my eyes. But I don't see the color problem everyone is mentioning. image
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    I like #2 better - more details.

    If the white balance is set incandescent, the color of #2 must be more accurate. When using reveals, you need to do a custom white balance for accurate color, as the bulb gives off more blues.
  • lsicalsica Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the white balance is set incandescent, the color of #2 must be more accurate. When using reveals, you need to do a custom white
    balance for accurate color, as the bulb gives off more blues. >>



    #1 is more color accurate.
    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • I like neither...

    Especially with modern Copper, I think you really need to only use 2-3 lights, otherwise you are way overlighting the coin, and these coins are already bright enough. Back down to 3 lamps, and try again... And your pictures also look like you used a lampshade... get rid of it... I hate the look that it gives coins, and I do not think it is at all accurate of how the coin looks in hand... And it is especially NOT needed on modern proofs, which already have great contrast and do not need any help... biggest thing I hate, is look at the fields in both pictures... they should be completely black... this is another problem of the lampshade, but may be because you are using 4 lamps...
    -George
    42/92
  • lsicalsica Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>And your pictures also look like you used a lampshade... get rid of it >>



    No lampshade. I didn't shine the lights directly on the coin, but no lampshade, no light box, just light




    << <i>biggest thing I hate, is look at the fields in both pictures... they should be completely black >>



    On a copper coin? I can see on a silver one, but completely black fields on a copper proof?
    Philately will get you nowhere....


  • << <i>I like neither...

    Especially with modern Copper, I think you really need to only use 2-3 lights, otherwise you are way overlighting the coin, and these coins are already bright enough. Back down to 3 lamps, and try again... And your pictures also look like you used a lampshade... get rid of it... I hate the look that it gives coins, and I do not think it is at all accurate of how the coin looks in hand... And it is especially NOT needed on modern proofs, which already have great contrast and do not need any help... biggest thing I hate, is look at the fields in both pictures... they should be completely black... this is another problem of the lampshade, but may be because you are using 4 lamps... >>




    image

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    The second one has a little better contrast, but that's a ligting position and number issue. the slight color diff can probably be accounted for by white balance.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file