Home U.S. Coin Forum

Now here's a piece of Modern Crap™ that'll be fun to watch.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
1964 NGC SP69 SMS Kennedy Half Dollar.

It was listed on Teletrade a couple years ago, bid to $15,000 and not sold. I think it also may have made an appearance in a Heritage auction, but I'm not sure.

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • Why does the slab say "specimen" instead of "special"?
  • mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
    Russ ...can you tell us what is "specimen"?

    to me ......(in my ignorance) ......it looks like any other kennedy half.
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    I think he's got some stones for starting it at a dollar with no reserve........ image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Why does the slab say "specimen" instead of "special"? >>



    Specimen at NGC is the same as SMS at PCGS. They label the matte finish 1998 Kennedy and the matte finish 1994 and 1997 Jeffersons the same way. BTW, not sure if it's this coin, but one of the two SP69's used to be in an incorrect PCGS MS68 business strike holder. Still shows up in the PCGS pop report.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Russ - I was wondering if you could enlighten me on something - forgive my ignorance but I'm here to learn right?

    I'm under the impression that 1965-1967 were the only 1960's SMS halves. Clearly in his header it says SMS. In addition to not knowing what the "speciman" means, I don't see any indication of SMS on the holder.... would you mind giving me a quick history of the SMS in regards to this decade and in NGG's markings to clear up my confusion?

    Thanks in advance

    Mark
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm under the impression that 1965-1967 were the only 1960's SMS halves. >>



    There were a limited number of "SMS" sets produced in 1964. They're referred to as SMS, frankly, for lack of a better word. The finish and strike on them are vastly superior to the regular business strike coins, but not prooflike as some of the later SMS coins. Sort of a cross between matte and satin. The estimated number ranges from a low of 12 to a high of 50.

    They are a legitimate modern rarity.

    Russ, NCNE


  • << <i>

    << <i>I'm under the impression that 1965-1967 were the only 1960's SMS halves. >>



    There were a limited number of "SMS" sets produced in 1964. They're referred to as SMS, frankly, for lack of a better word. The finish and strike on them are vastly superior to the regular business strike coins, but not prooflike as some of the later SMS coins. Sort of a cross between matte and satin. The estimated number ranges from a low of 12 to a high of 50.

    They are a legitimate modern rarity.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Thank you very much for the response 8-)
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,181 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Heck, there's some Modern Crap­™ even I'll bid on. A couple orders of magnitude to low, of course.

    This thread accidentally shows the evolution (devolution?) of MC. I'm comparing Russ's and thewiz1969's avatars, and even at 100x100 pixels you can tell how shallow and sterile the 1998 design is compared to the 1967.
  • I am winning.image


  • << <i>I am winning.image >>



    Nope now I am....image
  • no you're notimage
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    I'll save my bid, but I hope to make one.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • 9 bids already in the first 2 hours and 125 page hits! This should be fun to watch indeed!

    Nice find and info russ!

    Zach
  • Maybe it's just a lousy pic, but not a very special looking coin for a 69. Andy
  • I didn't check the auction records, but if I remember right these go for high four figures usually.

    I wouldn't mind owning an entire '64 SMS set. That would be pretty cool.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Here's the coin when it sold through Heritage for $9487.50.

    Seller used the Heritage scans and cropped out the copyright info. Thanks to PhillyJoe for digging that up.

    Russ, NCNE
  • PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭✭
    I would trade every Frankie I have for that coin!

    Hmmm, checking my coin list, there might be a problem.image

    I found the coin in my Heritage homepage listed under "Coins I'll never own."

    Joe image
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    I bet the ebay auction will end early because the coin is no longer available image
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    That coin was also listed on TT. I'll dig the pics up when I get home. The print at the right obv. rim is easy to spot in all the pics. I believe that was the $10 Merkin estate coin. The print is mentioned in the catalog listing.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I bet the ebay auction will end early because the coin is no longer available >>



    I've been watching this seller for quite some time, both under this handle and his other handle of skytyr2. He sells a lot of high dollar stuff, and I've only seen him end one auction early. In that case, he actually did sell it outside of eBay. It was also PhillyJoe's #1 fantasy coin - the only PF69UCAM Accented Hair.

    Russ, NCNE
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That coin was also listed on TT. I'll dig the pics up when I get home. >>



    image

    Russ, NCNE
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Yep. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭✭
    I'm working a trade right now. Seller wants a couple of bags of Columbian for the coin.

    Forgot to ask if he wants regular or decaf.image

    Joe
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Cool piece of Modern Crap™
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section


  • << <i>

    << <i>I bet the ebay auction will end early because the coin is no longer available >>



    I've been watching this seller for quite some time, both under this handle and his other handle of skytyr2. He sells a lot of high dollar stuff, and I've only seen him end one auction early. In that case, he actually did sell it outside of eBay. It was also PhillyJoe's #1 fantasy coin - the only PF69UCAM Accented Hair.

    Russ, NCNE >>




    So why the private bidder's list? Since you've been keeping an eye on his auctions, does he usually do this?
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>So why the private bidder's list? Since you've been keeping an eye on his auctions, does he usually do this? >>



    Yep, he always runs them private.

    Russ, NCNE


  • << <i>

    << <i>So why the private bidder's list? Since you've been keeping an eye on his auctions, does he usually do this? >>



    Yep, he always runs them private.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    OK, thanks Russ.

    I usually tend to be wary of those who run private bid lists. This guy doesn't fit the profile of somebody who regularly does that.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    My guess is that with the high dollar stuff he sells he wants to prevent the bogus second chance offers. Every time I sell a high dollar coin, my underbidders invariably get them. Sadly, one even fell for it.

    Russ, NCNE


  • << <i>My guess is that with the high dollar stuff he sells he wants to prevent the bogus second chance offers. Every time I sell a high dollar coin, my underbidders invariably get them. Sadly, one even fell for it.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Aha! I hadn't even thought of that. Thanks for the lesson.

    Only once did I get a second chance offer that I acted on. Luckily it was the real deal.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Up to $10,333.00 with four days to go.

    Russ, NCNE
  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    imageimageimage$10,333.00imageimageimage
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508


    << <i>Russ ...can you tell us what is "specimen"?

    to me ......(in my ignorance) ......it looks like any other kennedy half. >>



    Speciman is an Italian astronaut I thought. . .
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • Just offhand, without really doing a comparison study, the sheild on that pic looks slightly different than a regular business strike Kennedy. Kind of reminds me of the Cheerios Sacs in a twisted kind of way.
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Just offhand, without really doing a comparison study, the sheild on that pic looks slightly different than a regular business strike Kennedy. Kind of reminds me of the Cheerios Sacs in a twisted kind of way. >>



    Good eye. I have to believe the concavity on the lower left is an optical illusion or trick of the light though.
    Tempus fugit.
  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hey Russ, it looks kind of AH. Is that the case for these?

    And I wouldn't consider this modern crap. It's clearly a different animal from the regular strikes or proofs. With only 50 pieces out there, it's a legit rarity. More power to 'em.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭
    Doesn't look AH to me (the one on the righ is an AH):

    image
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Now at $11,433.00 with eight hours to go.

    Russ, NCNE
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    russ,

    thank you for the interesting thread.

    i ussually do not care for modern crap, but this coin, has an unusual
    history to it.

    20-50 minted? why do they not know for sure?

    AH or not? I am confused. how does one tell from ebay pics.
    edited to add: i understand what AH is, but is the coin being sold AH?

    thanks.
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Russ, by any chance have you ever seen this coin personally? If so, what's your opinion of it?

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>20-50 minted? why do they not know for sure? >>



    They don't know for sure. Some estimates are as low as a dozen sets. There's speculation that they were produced as an experiment in preparation for the 1965 SMS sets, but there's also speculation that they were produced as presentation sets. Don has some more info on this.



    << <i>AH or not? I am confused. how does one tell from ebay pics.
    edited to add: i understand what AH is, but is the coin being sold AH? >>



    No, these aren't the Accented Hair die (ODV-001).

    Russ, NCNE
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ, by any chance have you ever seen this coin personally? If so, what's your opinion of it? >>



    Sadly, I've never had the chance to view one of these in hand. I wish!

    Russ, NCNE
  • They are a legitimate ............ "modern rarity".

    An interesting concept.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A massive coin shortage started in early 1963 and got progressively worse into 1964. At the
    same time silver prices were escalating and there was the possibility that any coins struck to
    fill the void might disappear into public hands if the price continued upward. Still the mint did
    what it could to ease the coin shortage by dramatically increasing production. While many in-
    dividuals were hoarding coin with an eye toward future profits based on silver prices, there was
    also a speculative bubble in the coin hobby which focused on of all things; recent date BU rolls.

    There were books written like G.W. Haylings' "The Profit March of Your Coin Investment" which
    seemed to promise great riches if you just set aside ten or twenty rolls of all the current coins
    for a few years. Bags and rolls of recent date coins in all denominations were selling in the coin
    papers at high premiums and many people were getting quite wealthy serving these markets.
    At the time the mint and Congress blamed coin collectors for the shortage even though there
    were larger causes. A bill was introduced which would have effectively banned coin collecting
    and especially the collecting of modern coins. Mint and proof sets were both discontinued, larg-
    ely to punish collectors for the shortage. Date freezes were introduced in 1964 and 1965 to dis-
    courage collectors and mint marks were eliminated. Finally they removed silver from the coinage.

    During this time the mint knew they had many loyal customers and wanted to do something to
    keep them happy and provide the new coinage. The 1964 silver coins were still being struck
    into 1966 because of the date freeze as were the new 1965 issues. These dates were expected
    to last indefinitely in early 1966. Sometime in late 1965 the mint started experimenting with mak-
    ing new collector versions and many of these were on the 1965 issues but apparently they also
    tried some on the '64 coins. There were apparently fewer than 20 complete sets put together
    and at least some individual coins. The SMS halfs have been found even in half dollars being col-
    lected for melting. These are probably the most common of the '64 SMS's but it's unlikely there
    are more than about 30.
    Tempus fugit.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>They are a legitimate ............ "modern rarity".

    An interesting concept. >>



    There are numerous modern rarities with many being far rarer than these.
    Tempus fugit.
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Good post Sam. Anyone interested can do a search on Lester Merkin and get more info.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • final price: US $11,433.00
  • BigMooseBigMoose Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭
    If I am not mistaken, I believe Jess Lipka bought a few of these special 1964 sets out of a Stack's Sale several years ago.
    TomT-1794

    Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file