Options
Half Unions

Each of these $50 patterns, designed by William Barber, is unique in gold. The
reverse is very similar to that which appeared on the double eagle of the time. They
were struck in response to demand by bankers and merchants in San Francisco
(originally expressed in 1854) for large denomination coins to make quick counting
easier. These amazing pieces were once in the possession of William Woodin. A brief
discussion can be found at the
Society of US Pattern Collectors website.
Photos courtesy of National Numismatic Collection, Smithsonian Institution
reverse is very similar to that which appeared on the double eagle of the time. They
were struck in response to demand by bankers and merchants in San Francisco
(originally expressed in 1854) for large denomination coins to make quick counting
easier. These amazing pieces were once in the possession of William Woodin. A brief
discussion can be found at the
Society of US Pattern Collectors website.
Photos courtesy of National Numismatic Collection, Smithsonian Institution

0
Comments
I believe I sold it (at a loss) in "Auction 82" for a price in the mid $30,000 range. I hate to think how many multiples of that price it would be worth today.
<< <i>I owned a copper example in the early 80's. It was a true red/brown Gem and featured, what I like to describe as "oil slick iridescent toning" on both sides.
I believe I sold it (at a loss) in "Auction 82" for a price in the mid $30,000 range. I hate to think how many multiples of that price it would be worth today.
Mid-30s? You have five or six more I could buy?
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
<< <i>Mid-30s? You have five or six more I could buy? >>
Thanks Rick - I feel much better now
I would guess the coin would be worth approximately $200,000 now?
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Have you seen them in person during your trips to the Smithsonian?
FrederickCoinClub
<< <i>Nice, I have only seen them in books.
Have you seen them in person during your trips to the Smithsonian? >>
Yes. I took those pictures. They are spectacular. Beautiful. Great mirrors. HEAVY!
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Rick, THIS WAS YOUR CHANCE!!! (at a price offcourse)
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
<< <i>One of these came up for auction a few months ago, it didn't sell
Rick, THIS WAS YOUR CHANCE!!! (at a price offcourse)
Dennis >>
Unfortunately, that was the week I couldn't afford to spend $150k on one coin.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
So who did the photo shop cropping for you??
my my my my my my my
i take it the coin is as large as a round gold territorial slug??
i would love one in copper gilt
what do you think one of the smithsonian gold half union patterns would bring if offered at public auction in todays market????
<< <i>Yes. I took those pictures. They are spectacular. Beautiful. Great mirrors. HEAVY!
So who did the photo shop cropping for you??
I did.
Michael: My estimate is that they are about 1.5 times the width of a double eagle and much thicker.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
Yes. Aki says hello.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Rick - Did I ever show you the notes in Morgan's sketchbook pertaining to designs for a gold Union dated 1876? It bears a close resemblance to the 1876 Centennial Medal. Oddly, that medal weighs in at 167.2 grams (the right weight for a $100 gold coin). Strange. >>
Thanks for sharing that tidbit. That's cool.
Obscurum per obscurius
<< <i>Rick - Did I ever show you the notes in Morgan's sketchbook pertaining to designs for a gold Union dated 1876? It bears a close resemblance to the 1876 Centennial Medal. Oddly, that medal weighs in at 167.2 grams (the right weight for a $100 gold coin). Strange. >>
You mentioned it, but I am not sure whether I saw it or not. As for prices, I bet you're right...somewhere close to $10M.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
designset
Treasury Seals Type Set
<< <i>so would the union coin have been a 5-ounce piece?! >>
A little less than 5 oz. Equal to 5 times a double eagle or ten times a eagle etc.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire