Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Is this a "Real" 1922 Plain

Comments

  • Options



    Hard to say from here, but if I had to take a guess I'd say "yes".

    Jack
  • Options
    UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭
    Hard to tell from the pic but my guess would be the weak D variety.

    While the coin is worn, the reverse has the appearance of the weak variety.

    Joe.
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    I can't rule it out...but my guess is that it's probably the "weak D" variety.
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A coin you don't want to buy raw. There is usually a reason.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,390 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What 291fifth just said.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    From the photos, I'd say it's a Die Pair 1, or weak D. PCGS might certify it as a "1922 No D Weak Reverse," but it's not the real thing. The Holy Grail is the Die Pair 2 or strong reverse variant. Best to buy these certified by PCGS, NGC or ANACS. BTW, I should have a VF-20, PCGS certified as strong reverse for sale by the end of next week. Also an EF-45 strong reverse, also PCGS certified.

    Ira
    Dealer/old-time collector
  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭✭✭
    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If indeed there is no trace of the mintmark.........this coin is either a Die#1 or Die #3.

    If you look real close at the "L" of Pluribus and the "0" of ONE, you'll see a die crack that connects the two.

    That's the diagnostic for the weak reverse version.

    "NO D" or "WEAK D" coins were made from these dies, as the mintmark faded in and out continuously.

    Hope this helps.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    ldhairldhair Posts: 7,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
    pluribusimage
    Larry

  • Options


    << <i>If indeed there is no trace of the mintmark.........this coin is either a Die#1 or Die #3.

    If you look real close at the "L" of Liberty and the "0" of ONE, you'll see a die crack that connects the two.

    That's the diagnostic for the weak reverse version.

    "NO D" or "WEAK D" coins were made from these dies, as the mintmark faded in and out continuously.

    Hope this helps.

    Pete >>



    I believe I DO see the die crack near the L in PLURIBUS thru the O of ONE, but it needs to be a jogging or offset
    die crack to be Die Pair 1 no D. But frankly, even on most called No D from that die pair, I can still see a trace of
    the mintmark. In Die pair 3, which can be called weak D or No D, the reverse is MUCH weaker than Die Pair 1
    and the O of ONE is smeared on it's left side and bottom into the field. I can still see a nbit of the MM unless
    its a VG or less. Then, teh wear obscures the trace of the mintmark, usually.

    Ira
    Dealer/old-time collector
  • Options
    carlcarl Posts: 2,054 ✭
    Do you have a photo program where you could brighten up the pic's? That would help determine if it is a plain or weak D. There appears to be a slight D there but the photo is to dark to be sure.
    Carl
  • Options
    mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
    nope ...no peanuts!.....it must be a plain!image
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,678 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I know where there is a PCGS f12 or f15 strong reverse for sale. image
    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    Here's a little "reading material" for your info: Details of 1922 No-D and another one to read
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file