Home Sports Talk

Most underacheving sports franchises.

Saw a list on ESPN, here are some that were listed:

ATL Braves

Minny Vikings

Minn Twins

LA Dodgers




Anyone else think of any others?
«1

Comments

  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    Oakland Athletics.

  • Don't know what the criteria is-recent,overall, most talent with least results or what?
    I don't agree with any of the ESPN ones or the Oakland Athletics

    I'd say historically:

    Cleveland Indians

    Cleveland Browns

    Chicago Cubs

    Chicago Blackhawks

    Dallas Mavericks

    Portland Trailblazers

    Minnesota Vikings

    New York Knickerbockers

    Collect vintage basketball and baseball,graded rookies allsports, Robin Yount,Brewers,Bucks,Packers
    Putting together a set of 61 Fleer Basketball PSA 7 or better.
    Trade references: T,Raf12,Coach Vinny,Iceman,McDee2,Lantz,JSA
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Atlanta Braves for all they have acheived the last 15 years, won't be remembered much 50 years from now.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Relative to the money / resources available to them:

    LA Clippers

    NY Knicks

    Boston Celtics

    NY Rangers

    Chicago Blackhawks

    Toronto Maple Laffs

    NY Mets

    Baltimore Orioles

    LA Dodgers

    Detroit Tigers

    Detroit Lions

    Oakland Raiders

    Minnesota Vikings

    St. Louis Rams

    SF 49ers

    Chicago Bears

  • stevekstevek Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Philadelphia Phillies - worst choke artists of all time barring none for getting close and not getting the job done. There were many more "close" incidences with the worst being probably the greatest collape, during the very end of the regular season, of all time in 1964. They were up by 6 1/2 games with only 12 games left in the season and collapsed - I mean are you f'in' kidding me - just impossible!

    I know the thread said underachievers not chokes - the Phillies from around 1975 through 1983 had remarkable talent - and only one World Series title to show for it. Great hitting, great pitching, great fielding and only the one title. Every year except 1980 it was always something...and Houston came oh so close to beating the Phillies in the 1980 NL playoffs...it was so close to no titles at all.

  • I felt bad for the Phils in 1993 -- especially their closer, Mitch Williams. They had a great year and I was really pulling for them.

    It's been quite a while since Phila. has had a champion -- 1983 (Sixers) I think. That has to be the longest drought for cities with franchises in all 4 major sports!
  • yawie99yawie99 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    My beloved Blues have to be up there. They have the longest current run of postseason appearances in any major sport, which is sure to end this year, yet have never made it beyond the conference finals during that 20+ season span.
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • The first one that comes to mind are the Phillies.
  • Detroit Lions, then the Detroit Tigers.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    Anyone said the Philly Eagles?

    With what's arguably been the best team in the NFC for what, 5 years, they still haven't won a super bowl?
  • New York Mets of the 80's

    They had the talent to win more than one ring
  • Charlotte/New Orleans Hornets.

    Basically due to moronic ownership and injuries.
  • Although they are in it this year, this is the second pennant for the White Sox since 1919. Thats 2 in 85 years. Thats tough to beat. Even the Cubs have won much more pennants in that time frame.
  • From all the responses, one thing is clear. While we can all identify overachieving teams in any given year, when asked about underachieiving franchises, just about any team can be the answer depending on which specific time in their history you consider. Boston Celtics? Dodgers? 49ers?

    I think framing it in modern time - for instance, in the last 10-15 years, which franchises did not perform as well as (rightfully) expected given their talent, I'd say:

    MLB: Oakland, hands down, underachieving every year since 1990. Should be their motto.
    NHL: Rangers, even depite the one cup, or Bruins/Flyers.
    NBA: Knicks or Jazz
    NFL: Vikings maybe, Dolphins or Jets

    Any team that seems to have underachieved for any longer period of time did not in fact underachieve, they just sucked...
  • Atlanta Braves? What a joke!! Winning their division and making it to the post-season 14 years in a row is not underachieving!! The people at ESPN are idiots!!
  • It's obvious. The Yankees. The money they have spent, and the players they have acquired, they should be finishing the season 160- 2, and have a perfect playoff record every year. Their payroll is more expensive than a bunch of NHL teams cost.
  • Yankees - Pathetic

    $208 million Payroll, cant even make it to the second round of the playoffs


  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yankee haters = PATHETIC

    You all have nothing better to do then bash the Yankees while your own teams wallow in misery with ownership that cares about profit before wins. GOOD FOR YOU GUYS !!!image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • I never said that I hated the Yankees, that would be un-American. But I'll tell you what I do hate, taking the family to a ballgame and spending $50.00 on hotdogs and sodas. And why does it cost so much? Because we have to pay those ridiculous salaries.
  • Only $50.00 you got off easy. Dont forget about the parking.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Although they are in it this year, this is the second pennant for the White Sox since 1919.


    I believe they also were the AL Champs in 1959.


    SD
    Good for you.
  • You all have nothing better to do then bash the Yankees while your own teams wallow in misery with ownership that cares about profit before wins. GOOD FOR YOU GUYS !!!

    It's funny, everyone complains about us (we, Yankee haters, Red Sox fans, intelligent people etc) always corrupting threads needlessly with anti-Yankee propaganda. Yet every (often completely justified) shot at the Yankees like this one, where a user dared suggest that the Yankees are underachieving due to the massive payroll and non-existent recent World championships, is always met with stupid, defensive and off-base comments like this one.

    For shame. We'll wallow in misery as our teams lose (well, my teams don't lose much having won 1 of the last 1 World Series and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls), but you Softparade, are more than welcome to go wallow in your own loser vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade across all your team sports, leaving you with nothing but high ticket prices, in-fighting, and national humiliation. Yeah, I guess you're right. It is wrong to call the Yankees underachievers. To do so is to presuppose that a rag tag group of overpaid steroid freaks should win in the first place. Which, clearly, they've proven they can not.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>You all have nothing better to do then bash the Yankees while your own teams wallow in misery with ownership that cares about profit before wins. GOOD FOR YOU GUYS !!!

    It's funny, everyone complains about us (we, Yankee haters, Red Sox fans, intelligent people etc) always corrupting threads needlessly with anti-Yankee propaganda. Yet every (often completely justified) shot at the Yankees like this one, where a user dared suggest that the Yankees are underachieving due to the massive payroll and non-existent recent World championships, is always met with stupid, defensive and off-base comments like this one.

    For shame. We'll wallow in misery as our teams lose (well, my teams don't lose much having won 1 of the last 1 World Series and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls), but you Softparade, are more than welcome to go wallow in your own loser vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade across all your team sports, leaving you with nothing but high ticket prices, in-fighting, and national humiliation. Yeah, I guess you're right. It is wrong to call the Yankees underachievers. To do so is to presuppose that a rag tag group of overpaid steroid freaks should win in the first place. Which, clearly, they've proven they can not. >>



    oh shut up with your sour grapes Mr. Red Sox fan and # 2 payroll in baseball , jacka$$ image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • oh shut up with your sour grapes Mr. Red Sox fan and # 2 payroll in baseball , jacka$$

    My mistake, I thought this was the Sports Talk message board, not amature night at the Apollo.

    If that's the best you've got, I'm heading to bed.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> but you Softparade, are more than welcome to go wallow in your own loser vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade across all your team sports >>



    what was that about amateur night at the Apollo? image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>(well, my teams don't lose much having won 1 of the last 1 World Series and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls) >>



    Watch it BIG SHOT. Comments like the above will leave you labled as arrogant and spoiled! See what winning does? image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240



  • << <i>Yankee haters = PATHETIC

    You all have nothing better to do then bash the Yankees while your own teams wallow in misery with ownership that cares about profit before wins. GOOD FOR YOU GUYS !!!image >>




    HELOO! What else is a team, but a business? What do businesses do? Attempt to make a profit? tell me what's wrong with a team trying to do that? Do you think the Yankees are trying to win a world series for the fans? You are then delusional. they are obviously doing it for profit.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    Typical softparade OVERREACTION.

    How dare someone criticize the MIGHTY YANKEES! THEY ARE GODS, NOT DARED TO BE CRITICIZED!!!

    Parade, just because someone (justifiably) criticizes the yankees, that doesn't make them a 'pathetic' 'basher'....it just means they see that the highest payroll in baseball not equalling a world championship = underachieving.

    Why are you so quick to overreact and bash immediately? You call this place a cesspool, why, because someone DARES to criticize the yankees?

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You are probably right in this case Ax. I jumped the gun ....... my bad.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> (well, my teams don't lose much having won 1 of the last 1 World Series and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls), but you Softparade, are more than welcome to go wallow in your own loser vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade across all your team sports, >>



    See what winning does to the attitude? I wish I could find the article in the Boston Globe I read last year by a writer who described how he caught himself beginning to walk and talk like a Yankee fanimageafter another Super Bowl win. That it is true, constant success turned him and others into Yankee fans. Being Obnoxious spolied brats. It really was an interesting article.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Don't confuse pride with arrogance. I know Yankee fans don't know the difference, but its not fair or accurate to project it on the rest of us.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pride? LOL . Its the same damn attitude that you cry about Yankee fans having. You are a joke image

    You will never see me bash a teams "fans" in general. It does not take a smart guy to know that 99% of all teams fans are good ones. Its the likes of you, the 1% trash that all teams have that I enjoy beating down. In your cluless eyes, Yankee fans are not allowed to have "pride".

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Although they are in it this year, this is the second pennant for the White Sox since 1919.

    I believe they also were the AL Champs in 1959.

    You are correct. 1959 and 2005 since 1919.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>Pride? LOL . Its the same damn attitude that you cry about Yankee fans having. You are a joke image

    You will never see me bash a teams "fans" in general. It does not take a smart guy to know that 99% of all teams fans are good ones. Its the likes of you, the 1% trash that all teams have that I enjoy beating down. In your cluless eyes, Yankee fans are not allowed to have "pride". >>



    No, parade, you like crying 'yankee basher!' at every opportunity.

    You are so self-obssessed that you relish the fact that many, many fans of the game loathe not so much the yankees, but the overall arrogance (no, not pride) that surrounds its fans...fans who are more in love with their past successes than the team as a whole. When I see yankee fans, I see a lot of the attitude that surrounds LA Laker fans - a sense of entitlement, a sense of being owed championship after championship, that the other teams are mere fodder to be consumed and moved through on the way to another title.

    It's not a matter of jealousy that people despise the yankees - what, with their unfair payroll advantages and arrogant, obnoxious fans - they see the way the fans treat others, the way they look with disdain on other teams and their fans, and they dislike what they see.

    So before you go spouting off again about 'you're just a yankee basher! you know nothing!' Take a look in the mirror.
  • Oh please sir, stop "beating me down" mizza softie sir.

    Funny, you edit your posts with the same regularity and offer about as much wit, maturity, humor and intelligence as a certain other NY knucklehead poster who needs no mention. Hmm.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    For shame. We'll wallow in misery as our teams lose (well, my teams don't lose much having won 1 of the last 1 World Series and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls), but you Softparade, are more than welcome to go wallow in your own loser vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade across all your team sports >>



    dg, is this an example of your mature and witty comments? Shut up you idiot. You are in the 1% trash of Red Sox fans.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    dg, is this an example of your mature and witty comments? Shut up you idiot. You are in the 1% trash of Red Sox fans. >>



    'shut up you idiot'?

    Wow.

    Talk about mature and witty.

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>...fans who are more in love with their past successes than the team as a whole. >>



    Ax, I challenge you to find ANY comment I have made about past Yankee success or how many championships they have. Go ahead, you won't find anything.

    DG the Sox fan says it is "pride" when he shoves the "1 of the last 1 World Championships and 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls" crap in my face image Yet a Yankee fan tries to bring up any past championship, you guys say we love the past more than the team. Do you see how moronic this is? LOL

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Actually, I thought my "vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade" was rather eloquent and poetic.

    Softparade, you sir are a dried booger.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>
    dg, is this an example of your mature and witty comments? Shut up you idiot. You are in the 1% trash of Red Sox fans. >>



    'shut up you idiot'?

    Wow.

    Talk about mature and witty. >>



    Ax, come on image How any times do you run around this place calling people morons, idiots, etc. Now you are the pope?

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Actually, I thought my "vomit flowing through the gutters of NY as the championship memories fade" was rather eloquent and poetic.

    Softparade, you sir are a dried booger. >>



    Of course you find your own drivel "eloquent and poetic" It is "PRIDE" isn't it? image

    dried booger? Don't make me laugh dammit!

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    dg, is this an example of your mature and witty comments? Shut up you idiot. You are in the 1% trash of Red Sox fans. >>



    'shut up you idiot'?

    Wow.

    Talk about mature and witty. >>



    Ax, come on image How any times do you run around this place calling people morons, idiots, etc. Now you are the pope? >>



    When I do it, you don't see me calling someone out for making 'mature and witty comments', then call them an 'idiot' and for them to 'shut up'.

    Hypocrisy is a stinky cologne...but you're a yankee fan, so you probably like that kind of stuff.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    When I do it, you don't see me calling someone out for making 'mature and witty comments', then call them an 'idiot' and for them to 'shut up'.

    Hypocrisy is a stinky cologne...but you're a yankee fan, so you probably like that kind of stuff. >>



    ummmm, ok Ax. Problem is I did not call anybody out. That was done to me. Better read the post BEFORE that one. tsk tsk tsk

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    ummmm, ok Ax. Problem is I did not call anybody out. That was done to me. Better read the post BEFORE that one. tsk tsk tsk >>



    What are you, 5?

    "I didn't start it! He did!"

    Geez.
  • athleticsfanathleticsfan Posts: 249 ✭✭✭
    Oakland Athletics? That was a joke right.

    image
    A's World Championships-1910, 1911, 1913, 1929, 1930, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1989
  • If you're asking me about Oakland, no joke. In the last 10-15 years (basically since early 90s), Oakland has produced a seemingly endless string of fanstatic hitting and pitching talent, with no WS or even ALCS appearances. Granted they ran up against some tough Yankee teams, but the 2000s A's - with Giambi, Tejada, Grieve, Chavez, Long, and arguably three of the top 10 starting pitchers in the AL - never went beyond an ALDS series loss. They've won a lot of games sure, but with the talent they've had pass through there, to never win a WS or even make it to an ALCS is underachieving.
  • Guys, you seriously need to calm down. You're arguing over a boys game played by overpaid men, that really don't know and probably don;t

    care whether you live or die. What I dislike about the Yankees, is what I dislike about the Red Sox, the Red Wings, the NY Rangers, and other

    big budget teams. They over pay for players, and they pass the cost onto the fan which is ridiculous. If all these free spenders actually held

    back, most of these over priced players would not be over priced. It shouldn't cost more than $10.00 to buy a baseball ticket. It shouldn't cost

    more than a dollar for a hot dog. No one should be making more than $100,000 a year playing a boys game and actually only having to work

    as many as 8 months if they make the world series. It's sick. There are people struggling, doing real work to take care of their families, and

    they will be lucky if they make $30,000 after taxes. What I dislike about the Yankees is that over spending. How can you call someone a

    shrewd business man that tries to buy up every free agent that's available? I'm sure there are people that think what the Yankees do is unfair,

    but that's beside the point. What they do has been bad for baseball. Poor people can really no longer go to baseball games, so now it has

    become somewhat of a segregated sport between the classes. There was a point where anyone could go to at least one baseball game with

    their family without having to spend two weeks salary. Those days died long ago. I stopped going to any sporting events about three years

    ago because I sat down and thought about it. Paying $50.00 to sit in a hard plastic seat, while the ushers are rude to you and who knows

    what the food preparers did before putting the cow lips and rectum (hot dog) together is sick. If everyone stopped going to high priced teams

    games, the prices would drop so fast, but everyone seems to be looking out for themselves. It's pretty sad. We may call the them the United

    States, but united we are not.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    frolico ..... you the man image

    I have said so many times before .... the bafoon know it alls go after the Yankees for doing what is allowed by the rules. Indeed the money the Yankees spend IS NOT good for the game when most teams can't spend what they do. (Axtell, yes there are teams that need to go bye bye). All of you Yankee haters need to go after Major League Baseball and its system. The New York Yankees do NOTHING wrong. The system is WRONG. Get it clowns?

    By the way ----------> this is a clown image

    Axtell and dgbaseball if you go look in the mirror you will see what a clown is. THEN, after this realization is digested, you can carry your torches to MLB which is the real culprit.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Huh?

    I don't believe anyone has used the word "wrong" to describe what the Yankees do. The point was they spend a ton of money, buy the best players, then don't win. Text book definition of underachieving.

    Frolico,

    It shouldn't cost more than $10.00 to buy a baseball ticket

    Yes it should. I certainly agree that major sports are generally overly-expensive and players are generally overpaid. But put the violin away and try to keep up with inflation. Just as the rest of world has progressed since Babe Ruth made $100,000, so should MLB. It's called a free market society. It's econ 101. It's why your doctor drives a Bentley and no one says boo.

    It is unreasonable that my Sox tickets have more than doubled in price over the last 8 years, but there's a fair medium here, and it ain't in the 1950s as you so sappily yearn for.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Huh?

    I don't believe anyone has used the word "wrong" to describe what the Yankees do. The point was they spend a ton of money, buy the best players, then don't win. Text book definition of underachieving.

    >>



    Nice tap dance dg, YOU defiantaley think what the Yankees do is WRONG. Again, you are mis-directed. Take this up with MLB

    Text book definition of underachieving based on payroll? Ok, your Red Sox are right behind the Yankees in that case.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Sign In or Register to comment.