Why bother?
Stingray
Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
To grade this card, even wasting a free grading is not worth it.
Why would someone grade a card in this shape that is pretty plentiful?
Stingray
Why would someone grade a card in this shape that is pretty plentiful?
Stingray
0
Comments
1989 Topps Robin Ventura PSA 1-2
1990 Donruss Rick Dempsey PSA 3-4
1990 Score Scott Coolbaugh PSA 1-2
My guess is that these folks are just "donating" their money to PSA.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Easy to do - buy wax or cello packs and drop them a few times - instant 5's - LOL
Lee
Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
<< <i>P.A. - I assume you give away all the cards that come back better than PSA 5? >>
no i make sure they're at least 5 or lower, otherwise i dont submit them..
61 Topps (100%) 7.96
62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
63 Topps (100%) 7.96
63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
68 Topps (39%) 8.54
69 Topps (3%) 9.00
69 OPC (83%) 8.21
71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
72 Topps (100%) 9.39
73 Topps (13%) 9.35
74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
75 Topps (50%) 9.23
77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
88 Topps (5%) 10.00
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
Stingray