Well, Carew PSA Card Collectors...

SDavid

Are you feeling lucky?

ctsoxfan

Is there a slight diamond cut on the front? And, the back doesn't look worthy of a PSA 10.

My PSA 8 looks better than this card.

A761506

A fine example of a card that begs the question, why is it not in a PSA holder when the seller has tons of other PSA cards?

Perhaps the answer?

SDavid

Is there a slight diamond cut on the front?

I'm wondering if part of the top front edge is concealed by their holder . The top edge looks like it has a diamond cut but the bottom edge looks straight.

Throwdown

T
R
I
M
M
E
D
?

baseballfanatic

Wow it sure looks like someone took a slice off the top..............

envoy98

(I just know how much you guys love the "pixel counters" so I figured I'd throw this out there for you.)

Well adjusting for the tilt of the scan (which is 1 pixel), there is extra material on the top right of the scan. 6 pixels worth in fact.

The top of the left edge is @43 while the top of the right corner is at 37. The bottom edges however are only 4 pixels off. The whole right side has 2 full pixels more material and the bottom edge of the card is aligned to the bottom edge of the black trim thing in the holder so that should eliminate the possibility of it being covered up on one edge.

I had a 57 Topps Ted Williams that was identical to this and PSA returned it to me "Not Holdered - Miscut".

SDavid

Well, if you run the numbers on their beckett stuff that's currently listed, you'll see that a '67 Carew received a 0.0 on Sept. 7 (number 3913518). But, to be fair, this seller deals in so many high dollar cards, it could have easily been a different card. Plus, you would think a dealer would try GAI before beckett, not the other way around.

Carew29

T-R-I-M-M-E-D