Options
Images are perception and should not be deception
Just some thoughts I have on coin photography:
The importance of properly imaging a coin whether it be to promote for sale or simply to share with other enthusiasts, is incredibly great. This is expresed regarding many facets of the hobby. If a seller wishes to sell a coin on the web, and the image is not portrayed to its' complete potential, it may not create viable interest and probably will not realize its' true value. If it is exaggerated in such a way as to give a false impression of luster, toning, or technical condition, then the potential buyer will only cringe when the coin arrives for it will not be what was in the mind of the collector. It is amazing to me how this venue is almost exclusively related to coins. The other hobby interests I've had experience in which includes sportscards, comic books, and others, the imaging of these products is quite easy, in my opinion, to mimic their "look" with a simple scanner or mediocre digital camera. The art of imaging a coin is just that, an "art". The skill of having the correct type of lighting, the correct amount of light, the angle of the light, the type of camera, the camera settings, the camera distance away from the coin, the angle of the coin, the background behind the coin, etc. etc. All of these details must fall into place with synchronicity and if "one" is off, the coin will not be portrayed at its' finest and how it truly looks in reality.
The importance of properly imaging a coin whether it be to promote for sale or simply to share with other enthusiasts, is incredibly great. This is expresed regarding many facets of the hobby. If a seller wishes to sell a coin on the web, and the image is not portrayed to its' complete potential, it may not create viable interest and probably will not realize its' true value. If it is exaggerated in such a way as to give a false impression of luster, toning, or technical condition, then the potential buyer will only cringe when the coin arrives for it will not be what was in the mind of the collector. It is amazing to me how this venue is almost exclusively related to coins. The other hobby interests I've had experience in which includes sportscards, comic books, and others, the imaging of these products is quite easy, in my opinion, to mimic their "look" with a simple scanner or mediocre digital camera. The art of imaging a coin is just that, an "art". The skill of having the correct type of lighting, the correct amount of light, the angle of the light, the type of camera, the camera settings, the camera distance away from the coin, the angle of the coin, the background behind the coin, etc. etc. All of these details must fall into place with synchronicity and if "one" is off, the coin will not be portrayed at its' finest and how it truly looks in reality.
...There's always time for coin collecting. 
0
Comments
<< <i>All of these details must fall into place with synchronicity and if "one" is off, the coin will not be portrayed at its' finest and how it truly looks in reality. >>
IIMHO, even if done "correctly", it is still a very good image of someone elses perception of the coin. It is really just another "lens" through which to view the coin. An an "art" coin photograpghy will remain subjective - like grading. No offense to the photographers out there.
billy
-------------------------
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)