Question on the OC qualifier
WinPitcher
Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
Lets say you have a card, a 1952 Bowman Mays. It is a sharp card that would grade NMNT/MNT. It is however OC. The degree of OC would downgrade it by 2 points as it would meet the qualifications for a 6. The question is do you want an 8OC or a straight 6?
Steve
Steve
Good for you.
0
Comments
Scott
Edited to add: Grading is inconsistent and subjective enough. Qualifiers only make it worse IMHO.
T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
1981 Topps FB PSA 10
1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up
My Sets
Now, it seems to me that most people prefer cards with no qualifiers, but I think it makes sense to have the card grade describe the card's qualities as fully as possible. A PSA 8 OC gives you a LOT more information than does a PSA 6.
Just my opinion...and I'd prefer a well centered PSA 6 to a PSA 8 OC...but that's because I'm more interested in eye appeal than having razor sharp corners.
<< <i>On something like a 52 Bowman Mays, I would much rather have the higher grade, with the qualifier. It would show that the card has all the attributes of an 8, but it is OC. On a newer card, I would rather an unqualified grade. >>
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!