<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
I just thumbed through six pages of this without seeing a single coin posted... Is this a coin forum or isn't it.
Seriously though, it's good that everyone has seemed to put "all the cards (or coins in this case) on the table". There are two sides to every story and every story has a little fact and a little fiction. But let's try to keep our "eyes on the ball" (or coin in this case)
I wonder if all parties involved will be in San Fran at the Ana. That would be a good time to shake hands and get on with the hobby.
<< <i>This thread will reach 100 posts. Despite that, 97% of the people on the boards and 90% of the people who have posted to it have no idea what is going on inside. >>
Party number 1: you did some things behind my back that I didn't like, I caught you at it, now fess up; furthermore, you're using MOs that I and many others question; now admit it like a good little boy.
Party number 2: without admitting to anything, tell me if you were economically harmed in any way whatsoever; otherwise I'm gonna take the ball and go home and you can't play with it anymore.
It's a little scary posting for fear of association. But I feel a lot of damage to rodgers business could result from this thread that could be unwarrented. Rodger has purchased coins from me on a couple of occassions, payment was fast without problems. I have yet to win one of his auctions but if did would expect the coin would ship promptly without problems. As for the rest of this thread I would think if I was rodger, I would be making a call to EJ and taking care of this matter any way it needed to be. And move on
"As for the rest of this thread I would think if I was rodger, I would be making a call to EJ and taking care of this matter any way it needed to be. And move on"
Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
<< <i><STRONG>"As for the rest of this thread I would think if I was rodger, I would be making a call to EJ and taking care of this matter any way it needed to be. And move on"
</STRONG>Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
#1 Yes
#2 Yes >>
Just so people who might be "confused" on all this can have the info...here are the 2 questions that John asked that Roger FINALLY answered:
Here’s a pair of simple questions that would require yes or no answers:
1) Did you falsely create the 9295scott account to mess with me? 2) Did you conspire with Ron Howard to purchase from me without my knowledge?
btw.....when I was looking back for those questions, I noticed a neat little trick....you have a thread with arguments. People post...it gets to be a long thread. Go back a day or more later and edit your post. If no one quoted it, you can have a lot of fun when people start reading it anew
<< <i>Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
#1 Yes
#2 Yes >>
We now have closure, can we please just let this thing die?
I received a civilized and mature call from Mr. Barone today asking what it’s going to take to resolve our issue. I stated it would simply take what I asked for in the beginning. For him to simply admit, here on this public site, what he had done.
He agreed to do so and as all can see he has in fact kept his word in doing so.
I in turn, gave my word to put the issue to rest and will do so.
In closing I would like to thank and congratulate Mr. Barone in making what I believe was a wise and correct choice and doing so in a civil manner.
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Nutty posting is a red flag?
Honey, you just shot down 99% of us....
Be Bop A Lula!! "Senorita HepKitty" "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i> NO. He is working 100% of the time for Adrian. We do have some loose ends that need/needed to be tied up though but he is not AT ALL active in eBay rellaa, tts-too, airfaresavers/totaltravelsolutions, jdenab, <a href="http://www.rogerscoins.com">www.rogerscoins.com</A> or anything else numnuts wants to allege.
If this doesn't answer the questions posed in the first post to this thread I'm at a loss as to how to do it any better. >>
I didnt realize that bidding on your own auctions as from your own posting of your ids above, and then leaving feedback for yourself was acceptable on Ebay
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
That's not something I really care to have permanently in my feedback profile. Maybe I should charge for advertizing? >>
Now that's got to be in the dictionary as the quintessential example of hutzpah. I want to thank the academy for the opportunity to use hutzpah in a sentence today, as it was my assigned word of the day
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Comments
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
Ultra-Fast Payment! A+ Buyer. Call 214-597-7055 24/7 4 Recommendation. Keep Checkn' w/Us 4 Cool Variety Coins rogerscoins.com
That's not something I really care to have permanently in my feedback profile. Maybe I should charge for advertizing?
<< <i>So who won? Roger, the other Roger or the one that isn't Roger? >>
Hi, I'm Larry. This is my brother Darryl and my other brother, Daryl.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
Ultra-Fast Payment! A+ Buyer. Call 214-597-7055 24/7 4 Recommendation. Keep Checkn' w/Us 4 Cool Variety Coins rogerscoins.com
That's not something I really care to have permanently in my feedback profile. Maybe I should charge for advertizing? >>
Now, THAT'S funny
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
Seriously though, it's good that everyone has seemed to put "all the cards (or coins in this case
I wonder if all parties involved will be in San Fran at the Ana. That would be a good time to shake hands and get on with the hobby.
<< 100 >>
P.S. #111
<< <i>This thread will reach 100 posts. Despite that, 97% of the people on the boards and 90% of the people who have posted to it have no idea what is going on inside.
i read it...
i do!
Party number 2: without admitting to anything, tell me if you were economically harmed in any way whatsoever; otherwise I'm gonna take the ball and go home and you can't play with it anymore.
<<I wonder if all parties involved will be in San Fran at the Ana. That would be a good time to shake hands and get on with the hobby.>>
I seriously doubt there is gonna be any handshaking in this deal. My money is on Scott if it goes to fisticuffs.
Rodger has purchased coins from me on a couple of occassions, payment was fast without problems. I have yet to win one of his auctions but if did would
expect the coin would ship promptly without problems.
As for the rest of this thread I would think if I was rodger, I would be making a call to EJ and taking care of this matter any way it needed to be. And move on
Chris
<< <i>Now, who is Rodger?
Text
I knew I would regret posting.
<< <i>Now, who is Rodger? >>
Oh no! There's another player?
Russ, NCNE
Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
#1 Yes
#2 Yes
This is what i got out of it.
Roger = BAD.
hi, i'm tom.
i do not doctor coins like some who post in here.
<< <i><STRONG>"As for the rest of this thread I would think if I was rodger, I would be making a call to EJ and taking care of this matter any way it needed to be. And move on"
</STRONG>Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
#1 Yes
#2 Yes >>
Just so people who might be "confused" on all this can have the info...here are the 2 questions that John asked that Roger FINALLY answered:
Here’s a pair of simple questions that would require yes or no answers:
1) Did you falsely create the 9295scott account to mess with me?
2) Did you conspire with Ron Howard to purchase from me without my knowledge?
btw.....when I was looking back for those questions, I noticed a neat little trick....you have a thread with arguments. People post...it gets to be a long thread. Go back a day or more later and edit your post. If no one quoted it, you can have a lot of fun when people start reading it anew
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>Chris, thanks for the kind words. I did just that & to answer John's questions unequivically (if I had to chose between yes or no WITHOUT explanation),
#1 Yes
#2 Yes >>
We now have closure, can we please just let this thing die?
(Okay, I was only kidding.
Carry on.
Russ, NCNE
I received a civilized and mature call from Mr. Barone today asking what it’s going to take to resolve our issue. I stated it would simply take what I asked for in the beginning. For him to simply admit, here on this public site, what he had done.
He agreed to do so and as all can see he has in fact kept his word in doing so.
I in turn, gave my word to put the issue to rest and will do so.
In closing I would like to thank and congratulate Mr. Barone in making what I believe was a wise and correct choice and doing so in a civil manner.
Thank you,
John
I would like to thank all of the Rogers, the guy who isn't Roger as well as the new character Rodger protrayed by the actor Gary Colemen.
Thanks all for the wonderful show, full of plot twists, memorable characters and a happy ending.
I can't wait for the movie to come out.
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
<< <i>I would like to thank all of the Rogers, the guy who isn't Roger as well as the new character Rodger protrayed by the actor Gary Colemen.
Thanks all for the wonderful show, full of plot twists, memorable characters and a happy ending.
I can't wait for the movie to come out. >>
Seriously though, a serious issue has been resolved amicably.
Fascinating thread. All is well that ends well. Let's all try keeping to the high road from this day on
KJ
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Nutty posting is a red flag?
Honey, you just shot down 99% of us....
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>
NO. He is working 100% of the time for Adrian. We do have some loose ends that need/needed to be tied up though but he is not AT ALL active in eBay rellaa, tts-too, airfaresavers/totaltravelsolutions, jdenab, <a href="http://www.rogerscoins.com">www.rogerscoins.com</A> or anything else numnuts wants to allege.
If this doesn't answer the questions posed in the first post to this thread I'm at a loss as to how to do it any better. >>
I didnt realize that bidding on your own auctions as from your own posting of your ids above, and then leaving feedback for yourself was acceptable on Ebay
<< <i>It sure was fun. Can we do it again sometime? Please? >>
But, who played "Raja"????
Dang, ain't the coin business gotten fun in the 20 years I've been away....
(And where can I find that popcorn emoticon??)
Clay
Proud to be a real Hatfield family member
One of the Rogers. I forget which one.
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't believe I just read the whole thing. Only conclusion I can arrive at is that I will never do business with Roger. But then I arrived at this conclusion long before this thread. All that nutty posting of his in the registry forum was the red flag. Character counts with me. >>
Well, me too but I wasn't as clear about all of the id's as I should have been. I bought a coin from "RELLAA" on Ebay thinking it was Roger Anderson.
To me, positive feedback is supposed to be about the person the feedback is left for, not the person leaving the feedback.
I realized I had done business with "redcents" when I got this positive "feedback." left for me:
Ultra-Fast Payment! A+ Buyer. Call 214-597-7055 24/7 4 Recommendation. Keep Checkn' w/Us 4 Cool Variety Coins rogerscoins.com
That's not something I really care to have permanently in my feedback profile. Maybe I should charge for advertizing? >>
Now that's got to be in the dictionary as the quintessential example of hutzpah. I want to thank the academy for the opportunity to use hutzpah in a sentence today, as it was my assigned word of the day
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Semper ubi sub ubi