Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Most Worthless Graded Card?

StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
What is the most worthless card you have ever seen for sale that was graded, something along the lines of some 2005 common that got graded a like a 5, 6 or 7 that is basically worth a penny, but someone decided to get it graded.

Stingray

Comments

  • zef204zef204 Posts: 4,742 ✭✭


    How about this badboy...



    image
    EAMUS CATULI!

    My Auctions
  • kuntryboykuntryboy Posts: 141
    image
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    A sportflics getting a 5, that card is made out of plastic and could not be kept in good shape.

    Stingray
  • orion9578orion9578 Posts: 385
    Any card I send in? I seem to think the cards I send off are 8's+ and I get quite a few 5-6's back. Maybe I need to get my vision checked image.
    Ryan
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭



    link


    image
    ·p_A·
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Yikes, no combined shipping. that will get her multiple bidders.
    Good for you.
  • BigtimeBowmanfanBigtimeBowmanfan Posts: 191
    The Joss is a little off topic....no?
    Scott

    T206's are always being bought.


    aloof1003@comcast.net
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Scott the Joss is a reprint.

    Steve

    how is the Bowman set coming along?
    Good for you.
  • kuntryboykuntryboy Posts: 141


    << <i>The Joss is a little off topic....no? >>



    How so? The topic is worthless cards in holders.

    As of right now, the Joss is the most worthless graded card that has been posted. The cracked sportsflics card and the beat up 82 Brett card are both more valuable.
  • BigtimeBowmanfanBigtimeBowmanfan Posts: 191
    Steve,

    Duh.......... I'm at about 95% and have a line on most of what i need. I will shoot for the end of july or aug. to be complete than i was thinking about going back to T206's for awhile. Unfortunatly that will last about as long as it did last time which was 3 months before the $'s got out of control.
    My fallback will be the 53 Bowman color and 38 Goudey I figure there both fairly short runs and the Bowmans are still plentiful. The heads up........well we all need a challange.

    What are you working on ? Have you been upgrading your 52's ?
    Scott

    T206's are always being bought.


    aloof1003@comcast.net
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Been working on the 65 topps (I'm at 90 percent) and mars attacks.

    I have not worked on the bowman set since I picked up the werle with the w half missing.

    I do though bring it out from time to time and gaze at it. It would prolly grade out in the 5's It was built back in the day.


    Sd
    Good for you.
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How so? The topic is worthless cards in holders.

    As of right now, the Joss is the most worthless graded card that has been posted. The cracked sportsflics card and the beat up 82 Brett card are both more valuable. >>



    i would pay more for the Joss than i would pay for the other 2..

    i will pay $1 for the Joss, so in my opinion it is worth more..
    ·p_A·
  • NewJerseyMeatHookNewJerseyMeatHook Posts: 1,441
    image

    Take your pick.
  • zef204zef204 Posts: 4,742 ✭✭




    << <i>i will pay $1 for the Joss, so in my opinion it is worth more >>

    I'll pay $2
    EAMUS CATULI!

    My Auctions
  • xbaggypantsxbaggypants Posts: 2,185 ✭✭✭


    << <i>image

    Take your pick. >>



    I'll give you $.50 for these image
    My E-Mail Address
    Website
  • bowdowntomebowdowntome Posts: 398
    Please tell me people send this junk in for their FREE grades, and don't actually pay for the grading!!

    Here's one....and with only $4 shipping! I wouldn't pay $4 shipping if the card was free.

    image
    Football collector 1948-1995, Rams oddball cards & memorabilia, Diamond match.
    Cataloging all those pesky, unlisted 1963 Topps football color variations Updated 2/13/05
    image
  • iamthegreatcornholioiamthegreatcornholio Posts: 3,366
    no picture... per the pop reports

    1990 donruss #557 rick dempsey psa 3.
  • MooseDogMooseDog Posts: 1,946 ✭✭✭
    I don't have the scan any more, but in my first ever PSA submission I was so focused on corners that I neglected to notice two pin holes in a 1972-73 Maravich. It got a "1" of course.
  • baseballpa21baseballpa21 Posts: 57
    Or use a big time name!!!image
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    So if that Csonka has a population of 2 does that make it worth more?image


    Stingray
  • fsjeterfsjeter Posts: 1,390
    image

    Not necessarily worthless but I should have sold it raw instead of getting it graded. Oh well, I'll chalk it up to experience. image

    Scott
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭


    << <i>[Not necessarily worthless but I should have sold it raw instead of getting it graded. Oh well, I'll chalk it up to experience. image >>


    As long as you didn't call it "NM-MT" in the auction, the way many people would!
  • fsjeterfsjeter Posts: 1,390
    <<As long as you didn't call it "NM-MT" in the auction, the way many people would! >>

    No auction. I still have the card. image

    Scott
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • wufdudewufdude Posts: 356 ✭
    What made that Ripken a 5?
  • fsjeterfsjeter Posts: 1,390
    There's a small crease just below the "n" and the "J" in his facsimile signature. Sucks but it's my own fault for not seeing it before I submitted it. This was from my second submission and I wasn't all that versed on what to look for at the time. image

    Scott
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A crease and it got a 5? You lucked out. I would have given it a VG-EX at the max!

    Shane

  • fsjeterfsjeter Posts: 1,390
    <<A crease and it got a 5? You lucked out. I would have given it a VG-EX at the max! >>

    Correction. I should have said a surface wrinkle. It's barely detectable to the naked eye. Crease may be too harsh a word. image

    Scott
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even still, I thought the surface wrinkles warranted a VG-EX 4. So, are you saying that if the rest of the card is basically perfect, and it has a tiny surface wrinkle, then it can get a 5?

    Shane

  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Even still, I thought the surface wrinkles warranted a VG-EX 4. So, are you saying that if the rest of the card is basically perfect, and it has a tiny surface wrinkle, then it can get a 5? >>



    yep..
    ·p_A·
  • zef204zef204 Posts: 4,742 ✭✭

    image


    What was someone smoking when they sent this in?
    EAMUS CATULI!

    My Auctions
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>What was someone smoking when they sent this in? >>



    Perhaps a Largent fan?
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>What was someone smoking when they sent this in? >>



    Perhaps a Largent fan? >>



    Very unlikely. I, like most people I know, prefer a fine Cuban over a Largent fan.
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,281 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It took me 15 minutes to find out why this otherwise spectacular card was graded a PSA 5. The smallest wrinkle I have seen on a card yet, so small that I'm not sure its a wrinkle ..... BUT the only thing I found! Now its a coaster.

    Edited to say that the squiggly line on Tom's forhead is a piece of DUST !!!
    image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    I've got a lot of graded 1988 Topps Stickercards that have to be pretty darn worthless
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,435 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    Here ya go - no grade - card worth 2 cents!

    image
    Mike
Sign In or Register to comment.