Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Is this Jordan Fake?

PSA 10 Jordan???
The Lable looks funny to me.
The bar code looks like a bunch of black lines and nothing else. The font looks off to. No card history in his feedback and now a PSA 10 Jordan rookie?

Comments

  • DerekDDerekD Posts: 388 ✭✭
    It was the second time in four days this guy has sold this card for $4550. Hopefully the first winner didn't pay.

    First Auction

    It's funny how he says he got it in a lot of cards he bought. Finally one of those mystery lots pays off big. I would have believed him more if he said he found it in his attic. image Of course he follows that up with "don't know much about cards but I know this is Michael Jordans rookie!"

    Then when you add on one day auction, Immediate Paypal required, pointing out he didn't scan the back because you know what a card looks like on the back, the odds are so slim it's real and he has it.
  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    Fake, without question. I am sure PSA would like to know about the existence of a counterfeit holder bearing their logo as well - hope they see this and take some action against the seller.
    image
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    More then likely the card and holder are real.........................the seller though is not in possession of the card. (he stole the scan)
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • WabittwaxWabittwax Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭
    I have a few pictures of what a fake Jordan looks like and this card seems to match all the signs of a fake Jordan. I think PSA should look into this.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I only have scanned image of front, you know what a card looks like on the back anyway.


    That shouts out.......STOLEN SCAN

    SD
    Good for you.
  • phreakydancinphreakydancin Posts: 1,691 ✭✭
    I have to agree, the flip does not look genuine. The font looks different than any I have seen PSA use, including the early ones.

    image

    Edited to add: he's not showing the back because it is missing a the PSA hologram.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Odd how the PSA flip is a bit washed out in hue, but the card is a blazing, over-saturated red. The flip would be over-saturated, too, if they were scanned all at once. They don't seem to match.

    But I dunno why he would bother PhotoShopping the wrong card onto a real PSA holder. If he stole the scan, that scan has the real card already in it.
  • OnlypsahockeyOnlypsahockey Posts: 1,479 ✭✭
    I agree jr. there is definitely something wrong here. The ripples in the plastic bag mysteriously end at the bottom of the flip. The two 8's in the cert # aren't the same. The font is weird. This whole image is off. I'd stay way away myself.

    Bob
    57 Topps (83%) 7.61
    61 Topps (100%) 7.96
    62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
    63 Topps (100%) 7.96
    63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
    68 Topps (39%) 8.54
    69 Topps (3%) 9.00
    69 OPC (83%) 8.21
    71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
    72 Topps (100%) 9.39
    73 Topps (13%) 9.35
    74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
    75 Topps (50%) 9.23
    77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
    88 Topps (5%) 10.00
Sign In or Register to comment.