New Addition Today: 1973 OPC Hank Aaron PSA 9 o / c

rbdjr1

Look at the difference in PSA population:

TOPPS -- 838
O-PEE-CHEE -- 11

Which is worth more? TOPPS, of course!
Which is rare? LOL!

OPC Population: 11 Graded (Topps Counterpart Population: 838)

OPC PSA 10s - 0 (TOPPS Psa 10s - 0)
OPC PSA 9s - 0 (TOPPS PSA 9s - 57)
OPC PSA 8s - 0 (TOPPS PSA 8s - 306)

OPC PSA 9 o/c - 3 (TOPPS PSA 9 o / c - 10)

Scan of 1973 O-Pee-Chee #100 PSA 9 o / c

rbd

zef204

maybe people don't submit them because they are worth less and not because they are rarer?

iamthegreatcornholio

heh, check your underbidder.

zef204

who is diamondcrd?

edit: Oh yeah.

67standup

RBJR1,

Very nice card. Try to find a centered 1973 #1 or #100, that's why the POPs are so low.

Remember scarcity does not equate to demand. There's a '52 Topps Mantle every week on Ebay, but it will outsell most pre-war issues for which only a handful exist. A Venezuelan Bench rookie won't come close to a treasure like an SI Tiger Woods.

If you like OPC and the like, be happy, less competition.

I see you bidding on many OPCs, you must have a nice collection going.

packCollector

zef204, they are definately scarcer and the quality is not as good. poor cutting techniques , awful centering , were only a small fraction of topps production (5-10%) to start, and not as well cared for bacause the kids in canada only wanted the hockey cards anyway.