Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Weak 9?

williplettwilliplett Posts: 471 ✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Boy, I like the 1973 cards in general, and have been getting as many high grade ones as I can. What do you all think of this 9? It looks a little weak for my taste.

Comments

  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    The certification # matches up. ...

    ....That scan may not be the best......there seems to be some distortion.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    Yeah, it is hard to tell with that image? Centering seems ok though.

    Stingray
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    This is my favorite pete rose card from the 70's. The holder and white background seem to blend in a little too much w/ the card, at least in terms of being able to gauge how accurate grading was.

    TGIF

    Julen
    image
    RIP GURU
  • smallstockssmallstocks Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭✭
    Gots ta be a poor scan.

    Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
  • Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭
    I don't think the scan can be that off when it comes to the coloration of surface. Note the black boarder around the picture. I think this is just an over-graded card or a card that was slabbed with the wrong flip that should have gone to another '73 Rose.
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    Scan is washed out. Notice the PSA label appears almost orange.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


Sign In or Register to comment.