Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1954 Topps PSA 10 Lasorda

softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Wow, Steve at the Baseball Card Exchange says that a 1954 Cello pack was just recently busted producing this card plus another PSA 10 and a couple 9's.

PSA 10 54 Lasorda LINK !


A bit rough cut and OC on the back but still BEAUTIFUL! Just eye candy for me ...

1954 Topps #177 Bob Milliken PSA MINT 9 from same Lasorda Cello pack

ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Comments

  • baseballfanaticbaseballfanatic Posts: 2,415 ✭✭
    How come all the packs I bust comprise of a grossly miscut Don Mossi and the rest have more dings than my old Ford Pinto?
    Nice looking stuff........
  • Lothar52Lothar52 Posts: 2,664 ✭✭✭
    rough edges....
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>How come all the packs I bust comprise of a grossly miscut Don Mossi and the rest have more dings than my old Ford Pinto?
    Nice looking stuff........ >>



    Consider yourself FORTUNATE to be busting ALL of those packs!!! image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • A761506A761506 Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭
    What a gorgeous card on the front. The back is not quite as nice and theoretically PSA violated their own standards of a PSA 10 requiring a back centered better than 75/25... but the card is amazing. I'll be interested to see how much it sells for. My guess is somewhere in the vicinity of $5K, but who knows with these rarities.
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    Yes, what is up with that Lasorda, the back does not meet the 75/25 criteria? Though the front is quite nice. The rough edges do not bother me that much, just how they were made back then. Kind of gives them a little character.

    Stingray
  • ldfergldferg Posts: 6,742 ✭✭✭
    i enjoy seeing the vintage in psa 10.....wow!


    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, what is up with that Lasorda, the back does not meet the 75/25 criteria? Though the front is quite nice. The rough edges do not bother me that much, just how they were made back then. Kind of gives them a little character.

    Stingray >>



    Barely meets the 90/10 for a PSA 9 on the back it seems. The rough cut on the back would not bother me much in this issue. If it were one of my 1978 Topps it would be a different story.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • TheCARDKidTheCARDKid Posts: 1,496 ✭
    What happened to the upper left corner of the card? It looks like some of the paper is missing on the edge.
  • CDsNutsCDsNuts Posts: 10,092 ✭
    "God what a slow day. Maybe I'll open a few packs to kill time. Let's see....... '58, '73, '69....... Oh here's a '54 cello. That should be fun."

    Lee
  • RipublicaninMassRipublicaninMass Posts: 10,051 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How come all the packs I bust comprise of a grossly miscut Don Mossi and the rest have more dings than my old Ford Pinto?
    Nice looking stuff........ >>



    Mine have hit everything but the lottery
  • calleochocalleocho Posts: 1,569 ✭✭
    people might complaint about rough cuts now..but its truly one of the only ways that you can tell for sure that your card its not trimmed.
    "Women should be obscene and not heard. "
    Groucho Marx
  • studentT206studentT206 Posts: 172
    I personally love rough cuts on 50's stuff. The back centering isn't that bad, and I think the "eye appeal" factor may have come into play. What a beautiful card! I think we should take a stab at guessing final bid and see who is closest. My guess in 9983.17. Obviously those who guess late will have an advantage. How about no official speculations after card reaches 24 hours left?

    Damian
  • kuntryboykuntryboy Posts: 141
    I'll guess $8650.26 with Spence as the winner.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    I think either Dmitri Young or Tom Candiotti ends up with this one.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭
    I also like rough cut pre-60s cards. Not only do you know they are not trimmed but its a sign of the times. Adds some character to the card!
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The card ended at $7,875

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Sign In or Register to comment.