Seller is offering compensation for error listing
1bbnerd
Posts: 63
I won, paid, and received a '64 Topps Ernie Banks. As soon as I got the card, I looked at it closely and there are these white blotches on the cheek (left side on the card), obvious visible defects. The corners aren't perfect either. Anyway, I sent the seller an email stating that the card was not as described and asked for compensation or a refund. The replied they would compensate me. I was thinking about a $10 compensation as I paid $25 thinking this card was perfect as described. What do you think is fair?
You asked:
"The card isn't as described in the auction. It has flaws (dots) on the left cheek of Ernie Banks. It is definitely not nrmt to mint. At best, it is Ex-NrMt. I don't suppose you will compensate me or offer my money back, will you?"
I can compensate you. I apoligize. PLMK how you want to proceed. Thanks.
5200328280 Ernie Banks 1964 topps nrmt to mint! #55 cubs auction
You asked:
"The card isn't as described in the auction. It has flaws (dots) on the left cheek of Ernie Banks. It is definitely not nrmt to mint. At best, it is Ex-NrMt. I don't suppose you will compensate me or offer my money back, will you?"
I can compensate you. I apoligize. PLMK how you want to proceed. Thanks.
5200328280 Ernie Banks 1964 topps nrmt to mint! #55 cubs auction
0
Comments
You bought the card with a very weak scan and raw to boot - this situation was bound to cause you some disatisfaction - raw on ebay without a really good scan is not a good idea at best - I would only buy raw from someone that I knew very well.
There are guys who advertise in SCD every week who routinely overgrade their cards by 1 to 2 grades and one has to adjust accordingly - there is one seller who states: "cards so clean, you can eat off them" - like I would?
mike
edit: I forgot to answer that part 1bb - if you hate the card and off-grade - ask him to take it back if you don't like it.
A lesson should be learned by the seller to put in a better (and individual) scan for his items. A nice large scan would have shown the flaws you describe and made the buyer aware of what he was buying.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
Sellers are not supposed to mis-represent what they are selling (we all know it happens all the time). Yes, sure I could chalk it up as another lesson, but that's not the point. The point is the auction describes the card as 'No visible flaws and should grade out high'. If it's not as described, then this is the seller's error. I would agree if that it was my fault if the description didn't state anything about the quality and only had a very basic description. This auction is considered false advertising and deception to command a higher sale where it clearly isn't warranted.
True, this seller misrepresented his card. But you'll save yourself a ton of headaches if you do a feeback search on any seller that you're thinking of buying raw cards from. If you see any PSA or BGS slabbed cards in his past auction results just drive on.
"All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
Just my .02 cents
1960 Armour Coins
Greg Maddux Basic
Greg Maddux Master
All Time 49ers
There are bargains on Ebay, but you're looking in the wrong places.
GG
I think that many on this board are more then willing to help but you have to ask for it before you bid and before you pay.Anything after the fact is kind of a waste of time and doesn't really help you out.
Avoid any raw card off ebay that has a lot of hype and you'll be much happier. I've gotten several gem mint quality cards off ebay from newer issues, but they all had level headed, down to earth descriptions. I learned quickly that the "flawless, should grade a 10" cards were typically the worst conditioned cards out there...or they were trimmed.
Unfortunately, the positive auctions I described above are rare. A lot of ebayers equate marketing with lying. Sad but true.