Options
Grading Services
Hi--I am not an expert on grading but I have worked hard to learn something. I have sent in raw coins to PCGS and ANACS for grading and learned a lot that way. I recently bought a collection of ten Morgans that were all graded MS-64 by NGC. They really were! They were all slabbed and everything! And yet, half of them looked to this inexperienced eye like MS-64 and the other half looked like AU. Five of them were pretty badly scarred, they had little round brown spots on them, the hat was worn off totally, on one there was a perfect fingerprint like embossed on the silver. My question: I always thought NGC was as good as PCGS and ANACS. Is this true? (I sent these coins back, by the way--I really don't think they should have been graded so high.) Thanks for any input--Pups
0
Comments
If you use the search function you will find reams of discussions on the topic of how people feel about NGC vs PCGS vs ANACS vs all the rest of them.
Happy hunting
Also, you need to learn which issues are commonly found with weak strikes. Weak strikes are frequently mistaken for wear by those still learning to grade.
Here is a strike about as strong as they come:
Here are two examples of weak strikes:
Although the area above the ear is flat, there are no breaks in the lustre... that's the tell-tale sign of a weak strike vs. actual wear... with wear, the lustre is broken.
Jeremy
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>