Other grading company standards
lawnmowerman
Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
I know we always post threads laughing at or ripping other grading companies and this is no different but how can a card so badly oc be graded a 9.5? Is it just so they(PRO) can say they have a card such as this graded so high or is their standards really that low?
jordan
Matt
jordan
Matt
0
Comments
........but one thing for sure in a PRO holder the card is undoubtable trimmed.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
<< <i>The image itselft appears compressed from side to side. Anyway, I really doubt this card is trimmed. It's more likely a fake. >>
Now now now.......From the few months that I have been coming here to these boards the consensus is that PRO at least doesn't grade fake cards.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
Card is not real; but it was sold as is with no guaranty.
Buyer onecesar ( 192) Jun-27-03 12:27 Private
Reply by jfish02108ybt: I'm sorry the ruth card was not real
It's amazing how many people sell on ebay and violate the authenicity rule about selling stuff "as is" with no guarantee of authenticity.
The seller and the company are well matched.
mike
<< <i>THIS BREATH TAKING CARD IS AN EXCELLENT INVESTMENT JUST LIKE REAL ESTATE, >>
That's right! Forget buying homes, invest in PRO graded crapola!
Kids + Ebay = a bad mix.