FINALLY MADE IT TO 60% on my 1969 OPC
KalineFan
Posts: 868
Hey all......I finally made it to 60% on my 1969 OPC set.....WHEW!
Never really realized how many cards you have to go through to
find (8)'s or even (6)'s for that matter! They all look nice, but, alas......
you have Luis Aparicio, Lou Brock, and others that just don't seem
to come without the dreaded printers crease in the paper!
Anyone have any they want to sell or deal or trade send me an
email.......Have a few extra PSA graded from PSA 5-PSA 8.
BUT! ONLY trading or swapping with these, I don't sell them
outright as....well.....I certainly can't help you catch me in the
race for the best set! LOL LOL LOL.....anyway, thanks all,
I had to gloat!
Tony
0
Comments
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Very few people realize just what a giant booger these OPC sets can be!!!! Great job!!!!!
Frank
Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!
lynnfrank@earthlink.net
outerbankyank on eBay!
Thanks all! I hope to soon move it up to around 70%......I appreciate
the support...! GOOD LUCK TO ALL!
TONY
On a related note...if anyone can help fill in the gaps on my '68 OPC set (only one registered), please let me know. Long story short, the missing cards I have in raw, but PSA has failed to grade numerous examples submitted because they are short in size (they were printed that way, but PSA just doesn't understand.)
Tony, every see any of the '69 OPC "printer's line" cards, e.g., Banks, come without this defect?