How does PSA account for 'snow' on a card?
spacktrack
Posts: 1,084 ✭✭
Snow is never mentioned specifically in the PSA grading standards. Is it considered a print defect? Are they lenient on card issues where snow is a consistent problem--like 61 or 62 Topps baseball?
Also, 68/32 L/R centering and 50/50 T/B fits within PSA 8 standards, correct?
spacktrack
Also, 68/32 L/R centering and 50/50 T/B fits within PSA 8 standards, correct?
spacktrack
0
Comments
For example:
Otis Nixon and Darrel Porter cards have tremendous "Snowy" problems, so bad that in some cards they are invisible in the blanket of whiteness. Likewise, nobody could ever forget Otis Nixon and Steve Howe cards. I personally don't collect the 1986 Topps set, but I believe several cards in the set have "Snowy" issues (ie, Joaquin Andujar, Dale Berra, Enos Cabell, Keith Hernandez, Jeff Leonard, Dave Parker, Lonnie Smith, Al Holland, Lee Lacy, Lary Sorensen and Claudell Washington cards). The 1980 Ferguson Jenkins card has some "Snowy" issues as well. Conversely the 1969 Topps Lou Brock is a gem if you can find w/o that damn "Snowy" print defect.
WTF, my nose is bleeding AGAIN????
Julen
_______
Keith Hernandez:
"I'd stopped enjoying the coke high by '81. But I was still snorting in '82, and I'd sit there and say, 'Why am I doing this?' I was down to minimal use by '83, but the urges stayed with me through '85."
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
snow on vintage may not get it into a "9" holder but I have 1950s topps issues that are in 7 and 8 holders that have snow on them, especially the 1958 issue!