Home U.S. Coin Forum

1854-O "Huge O" seated quarter

RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
I think these are really neat. This XF-45 in the upcoming Heritage auction is one of the four finest graded at PCGS.

From the Heritage description: FS-004. Briggs 1-A. A likely scenario for this distinctive and very scarce variety would be a die having been shipped to New Orleans without a mintmark and the O being engraved in the die by hand.

How cool is that?


image
image

I will have to check it out next week.

Comments

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭
    So are these contemporary counterfeits as well?
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    image
    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Anyone got a cigarette?

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • RegulatedRegulated Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think it's a contemporary counterfeit - it shares its obverse with three other reverses.

    What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
  • And there is yet another example in the current Heritage auction, NGC EF45. You'd think there was a hoard of them or something image
  • lathmachlathmach Posts: 4,720
    This is a variety that has exploded in price since a certain party started hoarding them.
    I'm not the hoarder, by the way, I have only 2 of them.
    I've never seen one in as high a grade as this one in the Heritage auction, in person.
    Almost all you see are no better than vg.

    Ray
  • lathmachlathmach Posts: 4,720
    Welcome to the forums, Woodward.
    If you know the hoarder, send me a PM and let me know who he is.image

    Ray
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    I agree, this is a neat coin and I've always found it interesting.

    Breen's theory that the mintmark was engraved in the die by hand doesn't explain why the R and D in the surrounding legend is partially obscured. The legend would be below the surface of the die, and hand-engraving an "O" next to it should not have affected the legend.

    No question that the mintmark looks hand-made, I just can't make the connection to how the legend was damaged. If the mintmark was applied from a hand-made punch, perhaps the shoulder of the punch squashed down the surrounding area to where the field was lowered to the level of the tops of the incuse R and D.

    Or am I off-base here?


    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • KurtHornKurtHorn Posts: 1,382
    Looks like a die crack across the top of the A leading to the D. Perhaps when they hand punched or cut a mint mark they damaged the die causing the problems you mention with the R & D...
    "Don't bother just to be better than your contemporaries or predecessors. Try to be better than yourself." - William Faulkner
    NoEbayAuctionsForNow

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file