What looks good as a complete Lincoln Cent set?

I just let a friend, that is a coin dealer, look at my complete Lincoln Cent collection in a Whitman Classic book. Pages have been added to accomodate all in one book with a last page of proofs only. The entire set is uncirc 50 or better with a few excptions such as 22 no D.
I have also put proofs in places like 38, 39, 41, 42 and 50 to present. His comment was "Great except for the proofs where Uncircs should be". He suggested I replace thoes proofs with Uncircs to make the collection look better.
Any opinions??????????????
I have also put proofs in places like 38, 39, 41, 42 and 50 to present. His comment was "Great except for the proofs where Uncircs should be". He suggested I replace thoes proofs with Uncircs to make the collection look better.
Any opinions??????????????
Carl
0
Comments
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
You're the collector and should do what pleases you. However, I agree that the proofs should remain separate.
Jack
With that said . . . it is generally accepted that proof is a method of manufacture, not a condition. Business strikes are what you have in your album, so it should be completed as such. Many using Whitmans or Danscos just add a blank page at the back . . . housing the proofs (36-42 and 50-64), the SMS coins, and the Type 2s from 79 and 81. If the issue was 'proof only' . . like a 1990-S . . . then it of course goes into the standard hole in the album. But, if there are TWO possible issues, one business strike and one proof . . . the proof goes on the last page.
But . . . your collection is as individual as you are . . . go with what you like.
DRUNNER