How else could you describe it?

LickThoseStamps · April 24, 2005 7:37AM

Link

ChangeInHistory · April 24, 2005 7:45AM

Circulated proof? I think impaired proof is the proper terminology.

LickThoseStamps · April 24, 2005 7:58AM

<< <i>Circulated proof? I think impaired proof is the proper terminology. >>

You're quite right! I just looked it up in the PCGS lingo. Thanks!

LindeDad · April 24, 2005 8:23AM

Over hyped damaged goods. There are about five coins in the series that are harder to find and valued higher. Not even sure it's the silver or the clad?

LickThoseStamps · April 24, 2005 8:45AM

<< <i>Over hyped damaged goods. There are about five coins in the series that are harder to find and valued higher. Not even sure it's the silver or the clad? >>

It sold to a floor bidder for $12.00.

What is so special about the 1995 set? The mintages don't seem unusual.

How else could you describe it?

Comments

Leave a Comment