<< <i>Only if you believe that the "called shot" was not a hoax. >>
The called shot as it was is indeed a hoax. He wasn't pointing at the fence, he was point his bat at the pitcher who prior to his home run had given him a pitch high and inside to which Ruth took offense. He brushed himself off, pointed his bat at the pitcher, then teed off and hit the home run.
<< <i>Only if you believe that the "called shot" was not a hoax. >>
The called shot as it was is indeed a hoax. He wasn't pointing at the fence, he was point his bat at the pitcher who prior to his home run had given him a pitch high and inside to which Ruth took offense. He brushed himself off, pointed his bat at the pitcher, then teed off and hit the home run. >>
You know your history. Well done. Now will someone tell Grey Flannel not to perpetuate this myth?
<< <i> You know your history. Well done. Now will someone tell Grey Flannel not to perpetuate this myth? >>
I'd love to...but then, that doesn't make for as compelling a story. Someday maybe everyone will believe he wasn't calling his shot...hell, I bet there are people who say they remember seeing it.
Oh well...we all know how revisionist history goes.
"Although it remains one of the most popular stories of baseball lore, it might not have happened.
"The consensus opinion is that it probably didn't happen," said Paul Aron, author of "Did Babe Ruth Call His Shot?: And Other Unsolved Mysteries of Baseball."
In his autobiography, Ruth said he did point to the stands before hitting the homer, but interviews with players, including Cubs catcher Gabby Hartnett and pitcher Charlie Root, suggest that he didn't point at all or that he was pointing at the dugout where Cubs players were taunting him."
Wasn't there a person with an actual video/film of this event (saw it on TV)? All the tape showed was that he was counting....making the 1 (index finger) towards the pitcher, then 2, and 3. Gestering something about the pitch count. I don't know anything about this fact or fiction story with Ruth. Just remember seeing that on one of those Dateline or 20/20 type programs years back.
Even if it's inconclusively proven that he wasn't calling the shot, there would still be an aura about the game. That is, this jersey would still command a premium over other Ruth Jerseys.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin
Was listening to a radio interview by Tony Kornheiser last week, who was talking to Maury Povich. Maury's father worked at the Washington Post for 75 years....and actually talked to reporters who were there....and said that the Babe didn't call his shot, but was motioning towards the pitcher.
I know there are those that will never believe this, and I am not trying to convert anyone.
Completely off the subject, but it looks in that picture like there are bleachers in the outfield extending from the wall down to field level. Did Wrigley used to have bleachers there, or did they erect them for the Series?
"Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well."
Comments
That is a sweet item, but the way it reads did he wear that jersey the whole 1932 season?
<< <i>Only if you believe that the "called shot" was not a hoax. >>
The called shot as it was is indeed a hoax. He wasn't pointing at the fence, he was point his bat at the pitcher who prior to his home run had given him a pitch high and inside to which Ruth took offense. He brushed himself off, pointed his bat at the pitcher, then teed off and hit the home run.
<< <i>
<< <i>Only if you believe that the "called shot" was not a hoax. >>
The called shot as it was is indeed a hoax. He wasn't pointing at the fence, he was point his bat at the pitcher who prior to his home run had given him a pitch high and inside to which Ruth took offense. He brushed himself off, pointed his bat at the pitcher, then teed off and hit the home run. >>
You know your history. Well done. Now will someone tell Grey Flannel not to perpetuate this myth?
<< <i>
You know your history. Well done. Now will someone tell Grey Flannel not to perpetuate this myth? >>
I'd love to...but then, that doesn't make for as compelling a story. Someday maybe everyone will believe he wasn't calling his shot...hell, I bet there are people who say they remember seeing it.
Oh well...we all know how revisionist history goes.
I'm not even going to ask about the new german pope and all the smoke colors and bells... HEHEHE
GG
Link
"Although it remains one of the most popular stories of baseball lore, it might not have happened.
"The consensus opinion is that it probably didn't happen," said Paul Aron, author of "Did Babe Ruth Call His Shot?: And Other Unsolved Mysteries of Baseball."
In his autobiography, Ruth said he did point to the stands before hitting the homer, but interviews with players, including Cubs catcher Gabby Hartnett and pitcher Charlie Root, suggest that he didn't point at all or that he was pointing at the dugout where Cubs players were taunting him."
<< <i>Let the legend live. It's like telling a 3 year old that there's no Santa Claus.
>>
I have never been a Ruth detractor, in fact, I consider him the best player to ever play the game.
But inaccuracies should be corrected.
All the tape showed was that he was counting....making the 1 (index finger)
towards the pitcher, then 2, and 3. Gestering something about the pitch count.
I don't know anything about this fact or fiction story with Ruth. Just remember seeing
that on one of those Dateline or 20/20 type programs years back.
name was on it.
<< <i>Let the legend live. >>
Absolutely. The truth isn't all it's cracked up to be.
I know there are those that will never believe this, and I am not trying to convert anyone.