Rookie Cards
DS1991TOPPSCards
Posts: 127
Does the signature on a Rookie card bring down the value?
0
Comments
Check this out... There were two 1991 TOPPS Desert Shield Chipper Jones Rookie card selling on ebay.
Both have a grade of PSA 8
One is signed (PSA/DNA) and one is not... The one that is not signed... sold for $150.00 and the one that was signed only went to $40.00 (didn't meet the seller's reserve price)!!!
I just thought it would be the other way around.
In general, if a guy has signed a ton of stuff, you would be better off with the auto on a ball, rather than a card - if one values the card as such. If on a cheap RC, then the auto value may be more. E.g. you might get more for a Griffey Jr. 89F PSA 9 auto than a straight PSA 9.
Hal Newhouser went into the HOF by veteran vote and has signed a ton - his auto on a gum card books in SMR for 20 bucks.
This 53T SP Newhouser would be worth more without the auto IMO.
Just some thoughts and not to be considered the final word or anything.
mike
<< <i>Check this out... There were two 1991 TOPPS Desert Shield Chipper Jones Rookie card selling on ebay.
Both have a grade of PSA 8
One is signed (PSA/DNA) and one is not... The one that is not signed... sold for $150.00 and the one that was signed only went to $40.00 (didn't meet the seller's reserve price)!!!
I just thought it would be the other way around. >>
I think most collectors see a signature as taking away from the card. I would be more inclined to have the rookie card unsigned, and if I wanted an auto, would prefer a 8x11 or jersey or something else much more desirable (to me, at least) for the autograph.