Does PSA/DNA certificate mean the 52 Mick is real?
detroitfan2
Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭✭
Here's one for you: Autographed 52 Mick
We know how PSA/DNA feels about the autograph. Given that the PSA/DNA certificate labels this card as a "1952 Topps Rookie baseball trading card #311", do we know for sure the card itself is authentic?
Also, why are some autographed cards slabbed by PSA/DNA, while others just have an associated certificate? Is it a different price tier?
We know how PSA/DNA feels about the autograph. Given that the PSA/DNA certificate labels this card as a "1952 Topps Rookie baseball trading card #311", do we know for sure the card itself is authentic?
Also, why are some autographed cards slabbed by PSA/DNA, while others just have an associated certificate? Is it a different price tier?
0
Comments
A: Both are authentic, but the card hasn't been graded or slabbed. Given that it would grade a PSA 2, tops, I found it more attractive in a one inch screw-down rather than encapsulated.
The PSA/DNA letter says it is a 1952 Topps card, I would think if it were fake they would list it as so. Only thing would be if he switched the card but he would have to copy the signature exactly to the one in the picture on reprint worn like that which would be pretty near impossible. It is a truely great item and if you look at his other auctions he has some other amazing items. I would love to have that card.