Qualifier or Two Grades Lower...Which To Choose??
PROMETHIUS88
Posts: 2,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just wanted to get some opinions as I have run into this dilema while working on my 70 Topps basketball set. There are several cards in the set including the sp's that are difficult to find/big money in 8 or 9. So, to fill those holes, would you rather have a PSA 9 with a qualifier of mc or oc or go with the PSA 7 that just doesn't have the same eye appeal??
Any opinoins?
Tim
Any opinoins?
Tim
Promethius881969@yahoo.com
0
Comments
PSA 8OC ... a very nice card... for this set, gorgeous. The grade defines it will. If it were a 6 instead.... a person wouldn't know a thing and would have to see a scan.
www.jamesbondcards.com
www.vintagestarwarscards.com
paul@disc-or-die.com
transparentpunk@hotmail.com
Once more I trot out Eddie Mathews as an example of a 9oc that might earn an unqualified 8 upon regrade. It's doesn't merit the off-center designation by much. It might be close enough on the centering criteria for an 8 that overall eye appeal could give it the nudge in the grader's discretionary view. I've seen many unqualified 8's with this kind of centering.
But the Bench 9oc is SO much off-center, almost miscut, that I wouldn't be surprised if it got a 6 if I asked for an unqualified grade.
Personally, centering to me is of vital importance. I really dislike cards that are off center, and I would gladly take a solid 7 over a 9OC, and it would be a great deal less expensive, too.
It all is on personal tastes....that's what makes this hobby so great.
I was thinking that the question was: For a card that could be a 9OC or a 7 (same card) which grade would you rather see on the tag?
But your reply makes me wonder if the real question was: Would you rather own a centered PSA 7 (slight wear) or a PSA 9 OC (MINT but off center)?
For the first question, I would take the 9OC every time. For the second, I'd have to see the cards... but I agree that in most cases I would choose the 7.
Paul H.
www.jamesbondcards.com
www.vintagestarwarscards.com
paul@disc-or-die.com
transparentpunk@hotmail.com
Ken
Who knows, maybe when they start to slab 10's with qualifiers, I'll have a whole new dilema to face!
the set registry people. Yes, 6, not 7 that it counts for in the registry. PSA 9 OCs are
a pox. So the last bunch of stuff I sent in to PSA I put "No Qualifiers" for all cards
submitted. Didn't get any 9's OC or not but better than trying to sell commons with qualifiers
1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards
Sorry meant to include this in the previous posting since sometimes you guys like
looking at other peoples submission results (and try to determine if I got
the grader of death)
1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards
1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards
My experience from 60's BB was that a 7 would often go for book value or a little bit below. But I could very often pick up 9 o/c's for a dollar or less and be the only bidder. I would consider which tag would create a better resale 'cause some day they all gotta go.
Fuzz
how can a 9 mc have better eye appeal then a straight 7?
or do you mean the same card?
Steve
Great responses and nice to see that even in a world of 3rd parties controling the grading, we can still have a variety of opinoins on what we each like!
Reason: a cards purpose is to depict the player, show what he looks like.
I've often sold a 9 and kept an 8 because the 8 had better focus.
That said I would keep a 9 oc over an 8 or 7 IF the 9oc were better focused.
1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards