Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

60 years Vicky medal Off Metal Commemorative Piece

I have purchased some Vicky Medals and this is the second to arrive. It is 78 MM across and I think is either Cast pot metal or lead, it is a heavy piece. The area on the sideburns and neck did not flow in fully and left a crackled appearance. This also occured on the reverse fields on the right( Not evident in photo)image I have no more info.

imageimage

Comments

  • elvernoelverno Posts: 1,068
    That's a beauty. Is there an engraver's name or initials anywhere? I didn't see any but if they're in a shadow maybe I can get a line on it in Forrer. I love the lion's pose! image
    Vern
    image
    You want how much?!!
    NapoleonicMedals.org
    (Last update 3/6/2007)
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    I have looked all over this piece and can't find any initials or Edge markingsimage
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    That's a super piece, although Britannia could look happier.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    Would you look happy if a Lion was that close to biting your legimage
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    Anyone have any info on this one. I have not seen this pattern or this type of metal? used in Commems before.
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Nice piece!
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Bill, I would like Askari to have a look at this piece, maybe he has some ideas on Pot-metal castings.image
  • AskariAskari Posts: 3,713
    A pretty nice and unusual medal, Dan! image I can't remember seeing one like this before. The bust is an "official" variety, but the pebbly fields I find an attractive way to highlight Vicky. The reverse design is one I've seen before but I can't recall seeing the rayed crown. I suspect that the rev. design is drawn from another British medal of the 19th century, but I'm afraid I have limited familiarity with British medals of this period. I'm surprised there is no engraver's name because this is a very high-skill piece of work.

    It's unusual for such a large medal to have been made in such a base metal as pewter or lead. Lead, however, being softer, was often used for trial strikes and that may be what you have. It's even possible that this medal was never issued in this size because of the difficulties in getting the metal to flow up to fill all the higher relief -- and this medallic design combination would no doubt pose a challenge with its high-relief Vicky obv. and Britannia & Lion rev. If a strike-up test piece, that might explain the lack of engraver's mark as well, simply because it would be unnecessary at this point.

    Wish I could tell you more, but we need someone more familiar with 19th century British medals to comment.
    Askari



    Come on over ... to The Dark Side! image
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Mark. Trial piece or Pattern would explain alot . This may have ended up as two different medals and the rays removed and Initials addaed in the final version, Not uncommon.
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    78mm? image

    Quite an exceptional piece there, Boz. image

    Love the "rayed" crown. That reverse pretty much incorporates all design features common to UK coinage.

    Hey, I just noticed; that lion's face looks suspiciously like John Brown's!! image
  • farthingfarthing Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭
    I like this medal more each time I open this thread! image
    R.I.P. Wayne, Brad
    Collecting:
    Conder tokens
    19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭
    That is a marvelous piece. The reverse is a nice combination of many of the features that had been on the copper and bronze pieces up to 1894.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
Sign In or Register to comment.