Home U.S. Coin Forum

1878 8tf ms63 Vam ???? Ok Vam experts Look at this one

BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
Start on the obv....Every Letter and Star and DATE and LIBERTY is Doubled evenly Divided Ear.... Nose in place not over polished

The Rev ... Both Stars, One Dollar, United States of, All doubled

AMERICA is not Doubled (Strange)

Wreath doubled on outside, Both Sides

IN touching wing. A is away From wing

This coin is Doubled so much it should be A $2 Morganimage








image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Nice pics. Looks like longacre doubling.image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    mgoodm3
    ARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG(not injun) (morganacre Doubling)image
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great looking Morgan Dollar.
  • DD Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭
    Looked almost like a few stars were tripled. Cool coin.

    -Daniel
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

    -Aristotle

    Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.

    -Horace
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll take a stab at attribution. (I used to love checking coins when I actively collected Morgans). Tough to do without the coin in hand, but.....

    I'd say it's the A1f reverse, which would make it VAM-12, 16, or 17.

    If you held a gun to my head, I'd go with VAM-16 based on the doubling of LIBERTY....although 17 is also doubled there, it looks more like 16.

    Rarity is listed as "Common", but "Scarce above MS-63".

    For what it's worth......


    This is based on the book "The 1878 Morgan Dollar 8-TF Attribution System" published a few years ago.

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    TommyType
    It can not be 16 or 17 Remember it is a Type I Obverse, not a type II
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>TommyType
    It can not be 16 or 17 Remember it is a Type I Obverse, not a type II >>



    Then for heaven's sake, take that gun away from my head!! image

    Don't have time to go back now....Back to work in a minute.

    Sure looked like the A1f reverse to me. Both 16 and 17 are listed as II/I reverses in this reference book. Don't know if that makes a difference or not.

    Added: And VAM-12 claims not to have strong doubling on LIBERTY.
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    It's Crazy i tell you !!crazyimage
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508


    << <i>

    << <i>TommyType
    It can not be 16 or 17 Remember it is a Type I Obverse, not a type II >>



    Then for heaven's sake, take that gun away from my head!! image

    Don't have time to go back now....Back to work in a minute.

    Sure looked like the A1f reverse to me. Both 16 and 17 are listed as II/I reverses in this reference book. Don't know if that makes a difference or not.

    Added: And VAM-12 claims not to have strong doubling on LIBERTY. >>



    I don't know, I think TommyType has the correct attribution on this. I'm at work and have no references to check but it sure looked like a A1f reverse. I can't remember but with the vams 16 & 17, one of them had chips in the loop of the 8 or something like that and the other one didn't. There's probably a past message in here somewhere that has a good description of these particular vams when Rick had one he was showing.
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    I come up with a type I/ 2 / ? Raised designer's initial M picture attached

    THe Rev is a Type A / 1 /? I of in touching wing


    image


    image
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    An interesting Die Scratch from the Bow to the E

    image
  • BigDave your reverse looks just like mine down to the die scratch which is an a1f reverse mine is vam 17 yours is probably also
    steve

    myCCset
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    steve

    Vam 17 has a II/ 1 / 5 Obverse" Unequally divided rear portion of Ear"

    Opps You are right Type II Ok i am Wiping egg off my Face
  • Dave,

    The II/I Obverses also have an evenly divided ear. See the Obverse Design Types in the VAM Encyclopedia on page 99. The reimpressed die obverse II/I also explains why LIBERTY is doubled as well.

    From the new 8TF Attribution Guide 3rd Edition, Your coin appears to have the A1f reverse of VAM-12, 16, or 17. As the others have said count the 12 out because the 12 has no doubling of LIBERTY.

    Check the other features I pm'd you about and maybe we can narrow it down some more.
    ---
    At the present time I'm thinking VAM-16 because you mentioned that AMERICA is not doubled. VAM-17 has the whole U. S. of A. legend doubled.

    There is a real outside possiblility that it could be a VAM-11, but that hasn't show up to exist yet.
    ---
    Nah, not VAM-11. All the legend would have to be doubled for that one as well.

    If I only had a dollar for every VAM I have...err...nevermind...I do!! image

    My "Fun With 21D" Die State Collection - QX5 Pics Attached
    -----
    Proud Owner of
    2 –DAMMIT BOY!!! ® Awards
  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    I just read the book

    No i think after reading my book it is a type I doubled with a type II

    My Uneducated guess is Vam 16 Triple first 4 stars

  • BIGDAVEBIGDAVE Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
    Daniel and TommyType


    It Looks Like you Hit it Right>>>>> That was the Tell <<<<<the First 4 stars are Tripled Vam 16

    I wish to Thank you all for your Help

    David

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file