Home U.S. Coin Forum

What do tou think about silver proof statehood quarters?

As minted about 800k were produced...grading services appear to have graded probably less 5% with a majority in PR69.....these are selling between $20-$60 depending on the year....

Are these the closest thing to a modern rarity?

Or in years to come will these be very common even in PR69?

I know you all won't hold back on your comments.

Bill

Comments

  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,731 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They are great in the original packaging. There is nothing rare about them. (they are common now)
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570
    Are these the closest thing to a modern rarity?
    As minted about 800k were produced...image
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Grade rarity can exist in any series or issue simply because there is always a range
    in quality and there will be few of the very best and very worst. Grade rarity is only
    a factor if there is demand for both the coin and the grade. Since collectors appreci-
    ate quality and old coins the finest of them will likely always carry a significant premium.
    Te premium and the specific demand for quality will always be dependent on several
    factors. One of the greatest is probably the range in quality and how much improvement
    is available for the buyers money. Few buyers will be interested in paying large mult-
    tiples for small improvements in quality but might not flinch at paying a lot more when
    the quality difference is great. There are also always going to be some buyers for the
    very best quality regardless of this range or the added cost.

    There are many modern rarities but none of them are regular issues. As far as grade
    rarities are concerned there will likely be more interest in coins with the larger ranges.

    It's interesting that even where the range in quality is huge that there is so little de-
    mand for the modern coins that they sell for a tiny fraction of what an old coin of sim-
    ilar absolute rarity in that grade would sell for. This is even true for coins where the
    undergrades are also scarce.

    It seems probable that this will change in time due to the explosive growth in the num-
    bers of collectors for more recent issues.
    Tempus fugit.
  • prooflikeprooflike Posts: 3,879 ✭✭
    Look at the mintages of the modern gold comms... considerably less than 800k!

    image
  • Your average Joe/Josephine can't afford gold though.
    Coins, shiny coins!
  • ERER Posts: 7,345
    I just leave them in OGP. Once I have all 50, I'll probably frame them up together. Just for the fun of it.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,970 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Your average Joe/Josephine can't afford gold though. >>



    The most common modern commemorative gold coins are selling for $110 to $120. That is not a huge premium over melt. If these silver state quarters get to that level, I don't think they will be that attractive to Joe and Josephine either.

    The silver state quarters are GREAT in the original mint packaging, but I hate them in slabs. I won't buy one in a slab for half the bid price. As for rarity with a mintage of 800,000 and a survival rate of close to 100%, it will be a cold day in image when these things are considered rare. BTW, if you find one of these in less than PR-68, it's probably a rarity.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Regarding relative numbers minted, can someone explain why 04 proof sets are going for $ 60 and up, while the sliver proof sets are still available from the mint at issue price ($37)? Aren't there significantly more clad sets minted than silver?
    I realize that on some level it must be a suppy/demand issue- just that there are more clad sets minted, and all else equal, most would prefer a silver set to a clad one.
    Don

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,970 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I realize that on some level it must be a suppy/demand issue- just that there are more clad sets minted, and all else equal, most would prefer a silver set to a clad one >>



    I think that it has to do with marketing and promotions. Perhaps the monkeys at Home Shopping Club or some other boiler room outlet bought these things up and pushed up the bids to feed to the fish. There was a story in Coin World that the mintage on the 2004 clad sets was the lowest since 1960, which kept the ball rolling. In 1960 the mint issued almost 1.7 million sets. That's still a lot of coins.

    If I were a betting man, I would not want my money in 2004 clad Proof sets @ $60 a piece. I don't see how that is going to hold up in the long run. But since I'm considered to be a "modern basher" that means that I'm probably wrong. Still I'd rather have a 2004 silver set at its current price than a 2004 clad set at its current price.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Hi Bill,
    thanks for the reply. To further ask- what if I were to give you one or the other, with respect to resale 5 years from now- which would you choose?
    I'm flummoxed, because it seems to be a situation where s/d are out of whack... there are still significantly more clad sets than silver-m 1.8 to 1.0 or so?
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,970 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When it comes to predicting the price of Proof sets, I'm not the guy to talk to. Frankly I just collect one Proof set a year for fun and put my more serious money on other things. If you look at the record, 20 to 35 year old Proof sets have not done well in the market. Many of them sell for less than their issue prices. The reason is that there is core of collectors, like me, who want to own ONE annual set, but no more than that. Untill you get more Proof set collectors who want to put together long date runs of them, the prices will continue to languish.

    The State Quarter Proof sets have been a special case because they represent a (so far) unique 10 year set. There is still great interest in them from 1999 to the present because people are still actively interested in State Quarters. What will happen after the current State Quarter series is completed? Who knows? My guess is that the mint will start something else and interst will slowly fall. That's why I would not want to have a huge finanical interest in them. The supply is pretty high, ditto for the survival rates; and there is a chance that collectors will "turn to the next page" and interest will decline.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think people like the darn things, even in slabs or so it seems, because one cannot be won on ebay for a decent, if you call 19 bucks decent, price.

    No they would not be for me. The wife has a bad habit of finger printing her coins so a nice clean slabbed Oregon quarter would solve her touchy problem.

    Ken
  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These are GREAT!

    No other mint product more closely approximates a Franklin Mint product. Why, if FM could make em without havin to put "COPY" on em, they would be an immediate sellout as a "limited edition."

    Yours to enjoy with your family for years to come. A historic reminder that not all collectibles have to actually BE coins to be SORTA like coins. AND....with the valuable addition of being FULL NON CIRCULATING LEGAL TENDER, these wonderful mementos will be a cherished family heirloom. Operators are standing by.

    Gee, PROOFS used to be specially struck specimens of real coins using perfect planchets and special handling and packaging.

    How primitive.

    imageimageimage
  • DD Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭
    I found a silver proof Maine quarter in change last year image. Made my week!

    -Daniel
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

    -Aristotle

    Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.

    -Horace
  • I think they are cool. Of course, probably everyone likes their state best. I gave a bunch of them out as Christmas gifts - unslabbed, in a Texas holder to people who, otherwise, didn't even know they existed. I have one that is toned a very pretty gold from sitting in a paper envelope. I prefer any silver over clad, that's for sure. image
  • fishcookerfishcooker Posts: 3,446 ✭✭

    I think the silver shines much better than clad. Side-by-side the silvers blow away the clad proofs.
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    i think they are wonderful and fantastic if you get them in the original packaging and pick out ones with strong cameos and fantastic eye appeal

    they make a great showpiece set in lets say coin would black slab type holders

    or if you can buy them in ngc/pcgs holders at no premium what you would buy them raw that look deeply mirrored and with great eye appeal

    to spend extra money for a piece of plastic where if you broke the coin out of the holder it loses 70% 80% 95% or more of its value

    just is not something i am comfortable with

    if you are then that is great as long as you know and understand what you are buying

  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    if you really want rarity buy one with great eye appeal and deep cameo below proof 68 then you got a real rarity

    also do the sweet spot figure at what point the coin sells for in the slab dor what you would buy it raw for and get this grade just before the one or two point jump thaYT MAKES the coin many of hundreds? of times more in price

    as for me i am sure there is a difference but it is soooooooooooo slight that it makes no difference to me

    as i can have one dollar in pennies and only i have this one dollar in pennies and i can have hundreds of piles of 99 cents in pennies

    is the onr dollar pile sealed in a holder with a special certificate good? yes yes

    but i would rather have the pile of 99 cents in pennies for lotsa lots less

    buy what you enjoy collecting with money you can afford to lose
  • JdurgJdurg Posts: 997
    The silver proof coins do have a 'whiter' luster and look to them over the clad proofs. I never noticed this until I put together my Roosevelt set in the Dansco Album. With the clad and silver proofs side by side, the silver proofs just stood out more and seemed 'brighter' than the clads.
    I collect the elements on the periodic table, and some coins. I have a complete Roosevelt set, and am putting together a set of coins from 1880.

  • "It's interesting that even where the range in quality is huge that there is so little de-
    mand for the modern coins that they sell for a tiny fraction of what an old coin of sim-
    ilar absolute rarity in that grade would sell for. This is even true for coins where the
    undergrades are also scarce."


    Totally agree with cladking on this one. I'm getting two sets per year and will hold on to one of them depending on demand.
  • fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    I am building three sets. On in flag holders PR69DCAM. Two sets from the mint as they come out.

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • I have every year of the silver version slabbed by PCGS as PR69DCAM with those State Flag labels and I think they look great. Anytime I show them to family members or anyone else who has not seen them they always strike up great conversation. Most people (outside of the Coin World) have no idea that they are even produced in Silver.

    The State Flag idea by PCGS was simply genius and has attratced many new buyers. I called David Hall Rare Coins a month ago to get another 2004 set for a birthday gift and they were sold out, so I know there is some demand there for them.

    When it's all over in 2008, I will probably get all 50 framed. Will make a nice picture on the wall.

    As for long term value, who really knows? I see on eBay that the 1999 sets go for around $250 or more and I paid $150 a few years back, so I feel good about them. For a buy and sell within a year or two, this may not be the best pick. But if you get a set and hold them for 40 years. Who knows? Who really knows?
  • ..oh yea...I am from Florida and I think the Florida quarter is one of the ugliest that has been made so far. I really hate it.

    I dislike all of the state quarters that have that Microsoft Clip Art look to them with a bunch of tiny pictures crammed into that little space.

    I like the portraits much better (Delaware, New Jersey, Conneticut, Vermont, etc.)

    Just my opinion.....
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,656 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>These are GREAT!

    No other mint product more closely approximates a Franklin Mint product. Why, if FM could make em without havin to put "COPY" on em, they would be an immediate sellout as a "limited edition."

    Yours to enjoy with your family for years to come. A historic reminder that not all collectibles have to actually BE coins to be SORTA like coins. AND....with the valuable addition of being FULL NON CIRCULATING LEGAL TENDER, these wonderful mementos will be a cherished family heirloom. Operators are standing by.

    Gee, PROOFS used to be specially struck specimens of real coins using perfect planchets and special handling and packaging.

    How primitive.

    imageimageimage >>



    There are a few reasons that the silver sets can sell for less than the more
    common clads. The largest is likely that many newbies who collect these
    coins are not even aware of the existence of the silver issues. But many col-
    lectors of these coins are much more sophisticated than they're often given
    credit for; they simply don't buy them because they are considered to be NCLT.
    Silver is great and makes a very attractive metal for coinage but these simply
    are not representative of circulating coinage.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Its called supply and demand...

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file