Well, don't forget that the seller was expecting a 7 and hoping for an 8. Here's what I don't understand: I was taught that a trimmed card was worthless. Yet there are people bidding this card up pretty high for a "worthless" piece of cardboard. I guess that the old line about trimmed cards being worthless doesn't always apply.
"Charlie, here comes the deuce. And when you speak of me, speak well."
Some of those bidders want a genuine '33 Ruth that looks nice, and this is their best chance. At least PSA has deemed it authentic and not a reprint. That's worth a few hundred bucks to some folks.
But unfortunately, it's likely that other bidders are thinking to switch it to a PRO or GEM holder, or their own do-it-yourself graded slab, and scam it off on somebody for a profit.
Edited to add: It's not slabbed! I didn't notice that the first time. So it could easily be a reprint substituted for the real Ruth that was trimmed. Now I wouldn't bid anything.
Do you have to request the "authentic" designation if you have some doubt that it may be altered in some way? IMO, I think I would want it to say authentic because I'm paying for it to slabbed. At least I would know that it's real.
You are mistaken--looks to me like the card is in a penny slip, and it is partially on top of the card saver /top loader that has the PSA label saying trimmed on it.
I collect Vintage Cards, Commemorative Sets, and way too many vintage and modern player collections in Baseball (180 players), Football (175 players), and Basketball (87 players). Also have a Dallas Cowboy team collection.
Certain "trimmed" cards still retain value. This being one of them. How much value? well that would depend on a case by case basis. The 206 Wagner would of course still have "value" yet a 75 Rose would not. IMO
Steve
Edited to add: that card could have been holdered as Authentic/trimmed (I think) had the submitter requested it. IMO if I had sent that card in I would have used the min grade column and asked that.
<< <i>You are mistaken--looks to me like the card is in a penny slip, and it is partially on top of the card saver /top loader that has the PSA label saying trimmed on it. >>
So the card is not actually in the PSA case............there is just a PSA label there. That is what it looks like to me........................ ............in other words the card and the label may not have anything to do with each other.
Collector of:Baseball 1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete - Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
<< <i>............in other words the card and the label may not have anything to do with each other >>
That is true, but I am not making that claim in this case as I am not a collector of this set and am not qualified to make a judgement on this card.
I collect Vintage Cards, Commemorative Sets, and way too many vintage and modern player collections in Baseball (180 players), Football (175 players), and Basketball (87 players). Also have a Dallas Cowboy team collection.
Trimmed cards do still have value, provided that they are authentic. Many collectors would be happy to own a trimmed card that is otherwise real for a fraction of the cost.
PSA does not usually holder altered cards with a label that says Authentic Trimmed or whatever. When I spoke to them regarding a 1933 Sport Kings Red Grange that was trimmed, I was told that they will only holder very rare or significant cards that have been altered. Even then, I can only say I've seen a handful that have been holdered as altered. '52 Mantle comes to mind. A '33 Ruth may fit the bill, but the submitter probably would have had to call PSA and specially request it.
I've got a card at home, sitting in the top loader with a psa sticker on it stating "min size req". Couldn't I take my favorite 52 Topps Mantle and put it in that same top loader and pass it off? I realize there is a cert #, but is everyone going to look it up when you post an auction stating that the card was not graded by PSA? Seems like some would...but all I need is one or two that won't.
Ted Williams, Willie Mays, Tom Seaver, Mike Schmidt, George Brett, Bob Gibson, Lou Brock player collector
Comments
But unfortunately, it's likely that other bidders are thinking to switch it to a PRO or GEM holder, or their own do-it-yourself graded slab, and scam it off on somebody for a profit.
Edited to add: It's not slabbed! I didn't notice that the first time. So it could easily be a reprint substituted for the real Ruth that was trimmed. Now I wouldn't bid anything.
Think they should be the same?
So why didn't he do it?
doubt that it may be altered in some way? IMO, I think I would want it
to say authentic because I'm paying for it to slabbed. At least I would know that it's real.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
How much value? well that would depend on a case by case basis.
The 206 Wagner would of course still have "value" yet a 75 Rose would not. IMO
Steve
Edited to add: that card could have been holdered as Authentic/trimmed (I think) had the submitter requested it. IMO if I had sent that card in I would have used the min grade column and asked that.
<< <i>You are mistaken--looks to me like the card is in a penny slip, and it is partially on top of the card saver /top loader that has the PSA label saying trimmed on it. >>
So the card is not actually in the PSA case............there is just a PSA label there. That is what it looks like to me........................
............in other words the card and the label may not have anything to do with each other.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
<< <i>............in other words the card and the label may not have anything to do with each other >>
That is true, but I am not making that claim in this case as I am not a collector of this set and am not qualified to make a judgement on this card.
PSA does not usually holder altered cards with a label that says Authentic Trimmed or whatever. When I spoke to them regarding a 1933 Sport Kings Red Grange that was trimmed, I was told that they will only holder very rare or significant cards that have been altered. Even then, I can only say I've seen a handful that have been holdered as altered. '52 Mantle comes to mind. A '33 Ruth may fit the bill, but the submitter probably would have had to call PSA and specially request it.
I realize there is a cert #, but is everyone going to look it up when you post an auction stating that the card was not graded by PSA? Seems like some would...but all I need is one or two that won't.