MORE DSL BS
mudflap02
Posts: 2,060 ✭✭
HERE IS A 1/1 NOLAN RYAN PSA 10 BEING OFFERED RIGHT NOW BY DSL:
1988 STARTING LINEUP
AND HERE'S A CARD I HAVE IN MY REGISTRY RIGHT NOW, A 1/2
I'M GETTING SO SICK AND TIRED OF THIS DSL AND 4 SHARP CORNERS BUSINESS. IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S JUST ONE THING AFTER ANOTHER.
1988 STARTING LINEUP
AND HERE'S A CARD I HAVE IN MY REGISTRY RIGHT NOW, A 1/2
I'M GETTING SO SICK AND TIRED OF THIS DSL AND 4 SHARP CORNERS BUSINESS. IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S JUST ONE THING AFTER ANOTHER.
0
Comments
These 2 outfits provide many high quality cards for PSA collectors of all stripes. This drives collecting interest in PSA and the registry.
Where as you are just a fart in the wind, of little benefit to me in my collecting endeavors.
Loves me some shiny!
I get a card graded, and by jingo it comes back PSA 10! So I look in the pop report and it says only 1 card is graded that high. Hey, I have a 1/1, cool. Only I don't, because my just-graded card hasn't made it into he pop report yet. So for a time (a few days, a few weeks?) I might honestly think I have a 1/1 and even advertise it for sale as such. But it's really 1/2, or maybe even 1/26 because DSL just got back two dozen PSA 10's of this card and they aren't in the pop report either.
Now, I'm sure the folks at DSL and 4SC know about this lag and take advantage of it in their auctions. But it's possible that when they got this card back from PSA and made notes for the auction, the pop report DID actually say that only 1 was graded PSA 10.
A lof of my irritation with those dealers has to do with them flooding the hobby with PSA 10's. But that really is about the warehouses of unopened material from the 1980s and '90s rather than who is submitting it to PSA by the truckload. If not these and the other mega-submitters, someone else would.
carew4me - I think what mudflap02 is referring to
is that DSL many times quotes a pop report that hasn't been updated
to include the card they have for sale that they just got back from PSA.
So their 1 of 1 is really a 1 of 2, or their 1 of 4 is really a 1 of 5.
With the volume they do it would be tough to be accurate on every card,
but when they check the pop report and see that they have a 1 of 0,
it must give them a clue that the pop report isn't updated daily.
They're still the seller I spend the most money with.
I just make sure to double check their pop info before I bid.
"How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
DSL + 4SC+ PSA= PRINTING MONEY BABY
Peter
Vintage golf, 1981-82 Donruss golf, and a few other odds and ends.
IT'S THE SAME CARD, I GUARANTEE YOU. THEY ARE LABELED AS 2 DIFFERENT CARDS, ONE NUMBERED AND ONE NOT.
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE TWO SELLERS YOU NAMED?
<< <i>SO WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? THIS IS PSA'S FAULT FOR NOT TRACKING THE CARD CORRECTLY?
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE TWO SELLERS YOU NAMED? >>
I agree.
Mud
This seems to be a clerical error - SLU card mistake - why is this DSL BS?
<< <i>Where as you are just a fart in the wind, of little benefit to me in my collecting endeavors. >>
Carew
Let's say for argument sake, Mud is just flat, all wet on this topic...but why the hostility?
Stone
I am usually very leery of any seller who proclaims how low of a pop the card is because (a) I don't need to know how rare it is to want it and (b) the pop report isn't accurate.
<< <i>Where as you are just a fart in the wind, of little benefit to me in my collecting endeavors. >>
Isn't "A Fart In The Wind" a classic Elton John song? Or is it "A Fart Blew Out My Candle In The Wind."
Why stop there? Insult his (2005 Topps) Heritage too! Just had to work the name of this month's most popular product into this thread.
I suggest "your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries." Not directed at you Jeff, just poking fun at the gusty methane inundated scatalogical sarcasm used earlier.
As for the topic, it would be nice to have just one SLU for each card. Were they all printed with the number 30?
Keith
Steve
Let's see DSL top this one - A pair of 1/1's! Unfortunately, there will have to be a 'qualifier' on them - definitely "altered"
Sorry, mudflap, but this isn't DSL B.S. I'm not saying that there is no B.S. - or at least perceived B.S. - associated with these types of submitters, but this isn't an example of it.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
<< <i>Well, as long as there's steam being "blown" - for all those who know the ebayer selling the infamous bling bling sling - here's another creative ebayer selling his wares! >>
this guy sells crotch-weasels..
I don't mind altered, as long as they not on
cards.
<< <i>
<< <i>Well, as long as there's steam being "blown" - for all those who know the ebayer selling the infamous bling bling sling - here's another creative ebayer selling his wares! >>
this guy sells crotch-weasels.. >>
Now that certainly would be a fart in the wind.
I can see a string up the back, but only a string in front? What is the sense other than discomfort? Is there a beachwear law that says you have to make at least some effort to clothe yourself? I know in our neck of FL the law is complex and this would not pass.
Keith
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Well, as long as there's steam being "blown" - for all those who know the ebayer selling the infamous bling bling sling - here's another creative ebayer selling his wares! >>
this guy sells crotch-weasels.. >>
Now that certainly would be a fart in the wind.
I can see a string up the back, but only a string in front? What is the sense other than discomfort? Is there a beachwear law that says you have to make at least some effort to clothe yourself? I know in our neck of FL the law is complex and this would not pass.
Keith >>
Keith
Must be a chick thing - I would be spending the day scratching my ass!!!
your friend
Mike