Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is the 1899-P Morgan an Undervalued Coin?

RampageRampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
Any opinions on this? It is a low mintage, etc.

Thanks, Richard.

Comments

  • KollectorKingKollectorKing Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, this issue is readily available. Many experts say the mintage may be understated.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    According to Wayne Miller,s "An AnalysisOf Morgan and Peace Dollars",the stated mintage

    of 330,846 is in error. Apparantly so many working dies were left unused at the end of 1899,

    that they continued using them well into 1900. This mintage ,however, was added into the

    totals of 1900 rather then the totals of 1899. Thus the 1899 is considered little better then

    a common Morgan Dollar.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    <<No, this issue is readily available. Many experts say the mintage may be understated. >>

    From what I've read this was somwhat rare untill a large unc horde was released; like a GSA or something.

    Chris
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    You can never go by the mintages when it comes to Morgan dollars. There were over 520 million minted between 1878 and 1904, and nearly 270 million melted due to the Pittman Act in 1918-1919. Depending on where they were stored, almost entire mintages were lost to the melting pot (1901-P) and over half of small mintages of other dates survived (out of 228,000 1885-CCs minted, 148,825 were released in the GSA sale).

    As far as the 1899, Bear is correct. Working dies were used well into 1900, and those coins minted were included in the mint's 1900 report, though they were dated 1899.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file