Another Heritage 1 of 1..

easttexascardsandgames · February 19, 2005 11:02PM

Well not excatly but still a nice card

1 of 1

Lothar52 · February 20, 2005 12:24AM

....SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET

Stone193 · February 20, 2005 1:19AM

That kind of spam disappoints me!

Sure, if I count from 1 to 25, there IS only one 19!

BigRedMachine · February 20, 2005 2:06AM

I couldn't agree more!!! There's also only one #1, one #2, one #3, etc. What amazes me more is how buyers fall for this one of one crap, and pay multiple times over for a card that matches a jersey number. A jersey card of Hank Aaron numbered 44/100 may match his jersey, but there are a hundred of them. I guess as long as people pay a premium, sellers will continue to boost them up as one of one's.

ajw · February 20, 2005 2:34AM

<< <i>I couldn't agree more!!! There's also only one #1, one #2, one #3, etc. What amazes me more is how buyers fall for this one of one crap, and pay multiple times over for a card that matches a jersey number. A jersey card of Hank Aaron numbered 44/100 may match his jersey, but there are a hundred of them. I guess as long as people pay a premium, sellers will continue to boost them up as one of one's. >>

Some people think it's *insane* to spend $200 on a 1988 Topps card just because some company says it's a "10."

Some people think it's *insane* to pay a premium for a card just because the serial number matches the player's number.

Why is one right and one wrong? Both collector's are paying premiums for what they think is important. (Personally, I think both are a little nuts, but that's just me...)

Would I pay a lot extra for the 19/56 cards? No, but I do think they're kinda cool and are worth a tiny premium to me. Imagine someone putting together the entire run of 19/56 autographs. That would be pretty cool, don't you think?

Buccaneer · February 20, 2005 2:46AM

<< <i>
Some people think it's *insane* to spend $200 on a 1988 Topps card just because some company says it's a "10."

>>

Oooh, oooh, I know, I know. That one is absolutely wrong and insane.

Actually, the amount of money we spend on 95% of the cards is probably insane.

ArtRossLives · February 20, 2005 3:10AM

Indeed, the money I spend and any cards is nuts from a practical standpoint. That said, I think the 19/56 is cool and will add a small premium to the auction.

Stone193 · February 20, 2005 3:30AM

<< <i>Indeed, the money I spend and any cards is nuts from a practical standpoint. That said, I think the 19/56 is cool and will add a small premium to the auction. >>

Art
I agree the 19/56 is a nice touch but it's not a true 1/1 in a sense that there are 56 cards in the run.

your friend
Mike

Gemmy10 · February 20, 2005 3:37AM

But by golly the signature is red as blood making it a true 1/1. LOL

easttexascardsandgames · February 20, 2005 4:57AM

I would pay a small premium for a number that matches the players number, but not much. To call it a 1 of 1 though is just wrong.

rvc · February 20, 2005 6:10AM

i didnt know these cards were out already

JonB · February 20, 2005 8:39AM

AJW, I am one of those crazy few who think there is a time to pay $200 for an 88T PSA 10, lol.

At any rate, I have always thought that a serial numbered card that either matches the player's jersey number, or is numbered 001/100, or 100/100 have always been pretty "cool" and I personally don't mind paying a premium for them, of course not much of a premium unless it happens to be a player or card I just happen to really, really want.

easttexascardsandgames · February 20, 2005 8:42AM

i didnt know these cards were out already

Your kidding right??

1967topps · February 20, 2005 11:32AM

why is someone allowed to say 1/1 if it is one of 56?

Another Heritage 1 of 1..

Comments