Starting Lineups- gettem while they're low.......
CDsNuts
Posts: 10,092 ✭
I've been sitting on this idea for the past several years as the prices of SLU's have been plummeting. I've always thought they were a great collectible and I always had fun collecting my guys, so I never quite understood why the bottom fell completely out on them. Sure they were badly inflated at some point, but they went from having their own monthly Beckett to being a 2nd thought (Do they still have their own Beckett?). You can get the key unopened figures (excluding the ultra rare) for around $50-70 in very nice condition, and commons rarely fetch their MSRP. From a collecting standpoint, it's a great time to get your favorite players. And from an investing standpoint, I think it's a good time to pick up everything from the 88, 89, and 90 sets, as well as rookie pieces from sure-fire hof-ers (Shaq, Maddux, R.Johnson, Piazza, Duncan, etc...). Any thoughts?
Lee
Lee
0
Comments
Shane
I'm no expert on Starting Lineups but I will say that the total print run on them is not that large. The problem is, as was said, the demand right now is low. IMO, what killed SLU's was the discontinuation of the product and the advent of the McFarlane figures which are much more detailed. Having said that, the allure of the SLU is the "card" that comes with it.
I would agree with CDs, if you can get some of the key ones from 88, 89 and 90, and for cheap, not a bad idea.
With all the steroid crap, and if he has a comeback season, look for Ken Griffey Jr. to come out 'squeaky clean' and may be popular again. He is a 500 HR club guy without roids. His 1990 regular and extended copy were very popular.
The Michael Jordan 1993 is actually a low print addition for that year and desirable amongst the SLU collectors, I believe. Also, of course the Shaq from 93 is a good one.
Just look at the price guide in Tuff Stuff, e.g., and if you can pick up any of the hard to find high end ones - not a bad idea - but they will have to be cheap IMO.
And finally, condition of the package is everything with these - if it's beat up, it's not a keeper.
your friend
Mike
Lee
Regards,
Greg M.
References:
Onlychild, Ahmanfan, fabfrank, wufdude, jradke, Reese, Jasp, thenavarro
E-Bay id: greg_n_meg
I don't see demand every being big on anything modern unless it's truly someone incredibly talented and popular (read: LeBron) and in truly short supply.
<< <i>I think it's another issue over produced modern stuff that was supposedly 'limited' and once that was found out (and demand receeded) the bottom dropped out.
I don't see demand every being big on anything modern unless it's truly someone incredibly talented and popular (read: LeBron) and in truly short supply. >>
Axtell
That's true for all modern - but with the SLU's, there are some gems. In the 88 set, shoot for the Ripken, Ryan or Clemens; maybe the Bonds or Brett. If you can get an 89 Gwynn, Maddux, Ripken or Bonds. There are a lot of minor stars with supposed SP quality but they may be no-names but of value to the set collector. Mind you, the condition and the price have to be right!
Just some thoughts
your friend
Mike
Lee
I wonder if the drop in prices are due to the better looking figures by McFarlane. Those are awesome!
I buy these and could care less about condition. I just break them open and display them (McFarlane).
<< <i>Never understood the nostalgia with SLU. I think they're hideous figures, and poorly made.
I wonder if the drop in prices are due to the better looking figures by McFarlane. Those are awesome!
I buy these and could care less about condition. I just break them open and display them (McFarlane). >>
Good point Ethan
You are a collector. A lot of people keep them pristine, in the pack, for investment purposes, I believe.
Comparing the two products is apples and oranges. For one thing, the "card" in the package is part of the allure of SLU. Plus, some people like the simplistic nature of the figures. It's sorta like comparing the Hartland figures to McFarlane - no doubt which one looks better but there is a "group" who swear by the Hartlands.
your friend
Mike
Doug
<< <i>I actually WAY prefer SLUs to McFarlanes. No doubt the McFarlane pieces have way more detail, but I really enjoy the almost comic book look to the SLUs. Plus, loved 'em as a kid!
Doug >>
Bingo!
They came first...have the simplistic look...got collected for cheap....had the sportscard and have the "nostaligia" factor going for it in the future IMO.
your friend
Mike
GG
I didn't follow the SLU market very much. The discontinuation probably made them look more like a novelty than an iconic brand (i.e. GI Joe, Hot Wheels).
Lee
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.